Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38781513›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2024

From pixels to prognosis: unlocking the potential of deep learning in fibrotic lung disease imaging analysis.

Sean R de la Orden Kett Morais, Federico N Felder, Simon L F Walsh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sean R de la Orden Kett MoraisFaculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London, SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0006-3290-5842
Federico N FelderNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, SW3 6LY, United Kingdom.
Simon L F WalshNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, SW3 6LY, United Kingdom.

Funding

National Institute for Health Research Clinician Scientist CS-2018-18-ST2-004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The licensing of antifibrotic therapy for fibrotic lung diseases, including idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), has created an urgent need for reliable biomarkers to predict disease progression and treatment response. Some patients experience stable disease trajectories, while others deteriorate rapidly, making treatment decisions challenging. High-resolution chest CT has become crucial for diagnosis, but visual assessments by radiologists suffer from low reproducibility and high interobserver variability. To address these issues, computer-based image analysis, called quantitative CT, has emerged. However, many quantitative CT methods rely on human input for training, therefore potentially incorporating human error into computer training. Rapid advances in artificial intelligence, specifically deep learning, aim to overcome this limitation by enabling autonomous quantitative analysis. While promising, deep learning also presents challenges including the need to minimize algorithm biases, ensuring explainability, and addressing accessibility and ethical concerns. This review explores the development and application of deep learning in improving the imaging process for fibrotic lung disease.

Indexed as

Deep LearningIdiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansLungPrognosisPulmonary FibrosisRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of Resultshigh-resolution computed tomographyidiopathic pulmonary fibrosisimaging biomarkersmachine learningpulmonary fibrosisquantitative computed tomographysurvival

Identifiers

PMID38781513
PMCPMC11332672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.