ArticleBlood advances2024
Acalabrutinib plus venetoclax and rituximab in treatment-naive mantle cell lymphoma: 2-year safety and efficacy analysis.
Article in Blood advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02717624 (A Phase 1b, Multicenter, Open-label Study of Acalabrutinib in Combination With Bendamustine and Rituximab), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 1b, Multicenter, Open-label Study of Acalabrutinib in Combination With Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) or Venetoclax and Rituximab (VR) in Subjects With Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative Efficacy of BTK Inhibitors in Treatment-Naïve and Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Pooled it
- MRD-driven initial therapy of acalabrutinib and lenalidomide plus rituximab or obinutuzumab for mantle cell lymphoma.Blood advances · 2026Trial
- Trial
- BTK Inhibitors for the Treatment of Mantle Cell Lymphoma-Current Status and Perspectives.Cancers · 2026Review
- Disease progression more than 6 years after treatment impacts overall survival in mantle cell lymphoma.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- ROR1 protein: a pseudokinase at the crossroads of cancer progression and therapy.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Primary Lymphoma of Peripheral Nerve: Rare or Misdiagnosed? A Systematic Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- How we treat mantle cell lymphoma with cellular therapy in 2025: the European and American perspectives.Bone marrow transplantation · 2025Review
- Your chemo is no good here: management of high-risk MCL.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2024Review
- Acalabrutinib plus venetoclax and rituximab in treatment-naive mantle cell lymphoma: 2-year safety and efficacy analysis.Blood advances · 2024Article
- Review
- Tipping the balance: toward rational combination therapies to overcome venetoclax resistance in mantle cell lymphoma.Leukemia · 2022Review
- Combining BTK inhibitors with BCL2 inhibitors for treating chronic lymphocytic leukemia and mantle cell lymphoma.Biomarker research · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractThis phase 1b study evaluated safety and efficacy of acalabrutinib, venetoclax, and rituximab (AVR) in treatment-naive mantle cell lymphoma (TN MCL). Patients received acalabrutinib from cycle 1 until progressive disease (PD) or undue toxicity, rituximab for 6 cycles with maintenance every other cycle through cycle 24 or until PD, and venetoclax, beginning at cycle 2, for 24 cycles. Twenty-one patients were enrolled; 95.2% completed induction (6 AVR cycles) and 47.6% continued acalabrutinib maintenance. Thirteen (61.9%) patients had grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs), most commonly neutropenia (33.3%). Seven (33.3%) patients had COVID-19 infection (6 [28.6%] serious AEs and 5 [23.8%] deaths, all among unvaccinated patients). There was no grade ≥3 atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachyarrhythmias, major hemorrhages, or tumor lysis syndrome. Overall response rate (ORR) was 100% (95% CI, 83.9-100.0) with 71.4% complete response. With median follow-up of 27.8 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached. PFS rates at 1 and 2 years were 90.5% (95% CI, 67.0-97.5) and 63.2% (95% CI, 34.7-82.0), respectively; both were 95% after censoring COVID-19 deaths. OS rates at 1 and 2 years were 95.2% (95% CI, 70.7-99.3) and 75.2% (95% CI, 50.3-88.9), respectively; both were 100% after censoring COVID-19 deaths. Overall, 87.5% of patients with available minimal residual disease (MRD) data achieved MRD negativity (10-6; next-generation sequencing) during treatment. AVR represents a chemotherapy-free regimen for TN MCL and resulted in high ORR and high rates of MRD negativity. The trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02717624.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.