Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38781315›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2024

Acalabrutinib plus venetoclax and rituximab in treatment-naive mantle cell lymphoma: 2-year safety and efficacy analysis.

Michael Wang, Tadeusz Robak, Kami J Maddocks, Tycel Phillips, Stephen D Smith, David Gallinson, Roser Calvo, Chuan-Chuan Wun, Veerendra Munugalavadla, Wojciech Jurczak

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02717624 (A Phase 1b, Multicenter, Open-label Study of Acalabrutinib in Combination With Bendamustine and Rituximab), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02717624 phase1active not recruitingnot on this map

A Phase 1b, Multicenter, Open-label Study of Acalabrutinib in Combination With Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) or Venetoclax and Rituximab (VR) in Subjects With Mantle Cell Lymphoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorAcerta Pharma BVRan2016 to 2027Enrolled72ConditionsMantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL)ArmsAcalabrutinib in combination with BR, Acalabrutinib in combination with VR
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Your chemo is no good here: management of high-risk MCL.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michael WangDepartment of Lymphoma/Myeloma, Division of Cancer Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0001-9748-5486
Tadeusz RobakDepartment of Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3411-6357
Kami J MaddocksDivision of Hematology, The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Tycel PhillipsUniversity of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI.ORCID 0000-0003-2143-9672
Stephen D SmithUniversity of Washington/Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.
David GallinsonSummit Medical Group, Florham Park, NJ.
Roser CalvoAstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD.
Chuan-Chuan WunAstraZeneca, South San Francisco, CA.
Veerendra MunugalavadlaAstraZeneca, South San Francisco, CA.
Wojciech JurczakMaria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1879-8084

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractThis phase 1b study evaluated safety and efficacy of acalabrutinib, venetoclax, and rituximab (AVR) in treatment-naive mantle cell lymphoma (TN MCL). Patients received acalabrutinib from cycle 1 until progressive disease (PD) or undue toxicity, rituximab for 6 cycles with maintenance every other cycle through cycle 24 or until PD, and venetoclax, beginning at cycle 2, for 24 cycles. Twenty-one patients were enrolled; 95.2% completed induction (6 AVR cycles) and 47.6% continued acalabrutinib maintenance. Thirteen (61.9%) patients had grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs), most commonly neutropenia (33.3%). Seven (33.3%) patients had COVID-19 infection (6 [28.6%] serious AEs and 5 [23.8%] deaths, all among unvaccinated patients). There was no grade ≥3 atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachyarrhythmias, major hemorrhages, or tumor lysis syndrome. Overall response rate (ORR) was 100% (95% CI, 83.9-100.0) with 71.4% complete response. With median follow-up of 27.8 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached. PFS rates at 1 and 2 years were 90.5% (95% CI, 67.0-97.5) and 63.2% (95% CI, 34.7-82.0), respectively; both were 95% after censoring COVID-19 deaths. OS rates at 1 and 2 years were 95.2% (95% CI, 70.7-99.3) and 75.2% (95% CI, 50.3-88.9), respectively; both were 100% after censoring COVID-19 deaths. Overall, 87.5% of patients with available minimal residual disease (MRD) data achieved MRD negativity (10-6; next-generation sequencing) during treatment. AVR represents a chemotherapy-free regimen for TN MCL and resulted in high ORR and high rates of MRD negativity. The trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02717624.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBenzamidesLymphoma, Mantle-CellPyrazinesRituximabSulfonamidesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicCOVID-19FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2acalabrutinibBenzamidesBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicPyrazinesRituximabSulfonamidesvenetoclax

Identifiers

PMID38781315
PMCPMC11399641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.