Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38781156›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2024

Diverse task-driven modeling of macaque V4 reveals functional specialization towards semantic tasks.

Santiago A Cadena, Konstantin F Willeke, Kelli Restivo, George Denfield, Fabian H Sinz, Matthias Bethge, Andreas S Tolias, Alexander S Ecker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A TALE OF TWO TAILS: PREFERRED AND ANTI-PREFERRED NATURAL STIMULI IN VISUAL CORTEX.... International Conference on Learning Representations · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Energy Guided Diffusion for Generating Neurally Exciting Images.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  12. A Unifying Principle for the Functional Organization of Visual Cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Santiago A CadenaInstitute of Computer Science and Campus Institute Data Science, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7508-4443
Konstantin F WillekeBernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Tübingen, Germany.
Kelli RestivoCenter for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
George DenfieldCenter for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Fabian H SinzInstitute of Computer Science and Campus Institute Data Science, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Matthias BethgeInstitute for Theoretical Physics and Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Andreas S ToliasCenter for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Alexander S EckerInstitute of Computer Science and Campus Institute Data Science, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

Funding

Initiative for Maximizing Student Development (IMSD) ProgramR25GM056929 · NIGMS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI PEREIRA, FRED A · 1998 to 2023
$12.4M
Dissecting the Fabric of the Cerebral CortexDP1EY023176 · NEI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI TOLIAS, ANDREAS · 2012 to 2015
$3.1M
Probabilistic coding in cortical populationsR01EY026927 · NEI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI MA, WEI JI, TOLIAS, ANDREAS · 2017 to 2021
$1.9M
Dissecting the Fabric of the Cerebral CortexDP1OD008301 · OD · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI TOLIAS, ANDREAS · 2011 to 2011
$783k
Baylor College of Medicine Initiative for Maximizing Student DevelopmentT32GM152777 · NIGMS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI PANGAS, STEPHANIE A., PEREIRA, FRED A · 2024 to 2024
$547k
NEI NIH HHS DP1 EY023176NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026927NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM056929NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM152777NIH HHS DP1 OD008301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Responses to natural stimuli in area V4-a mid-level area of the visual ventral stream-are well predicted by features from convolutional neural networks (CNNs) trained on image classification. This result has been taken as evidence for the functional role of V4 in object classification. However, we currently do not know if and to what extent V4 plays a role in solving other computational objectives. Here, we investigated normative accounts of V4 (and V1 for comparison) by predicting macaque single-neuron responses to natural images from the representations extracted by 23 CNNs trained on different computer vision tasks including semantic, geometric, 2D, and 3D types of tasks. We found that V4 was best predicted by semantic classification features and exhibited high task selectivity, while the choice of task was less consequential to V1 performance. Consistent with traditional characterizations of V4 function that show its high-dimensional tuning to various 2D and 3D stimulus directions, we found that diverse non-semantic tasks explained aspects of V4 function that are not captured by individual semantic tasks. Nevertheless, jointly considering the features of a pair of semantic classification tasks was sufficient to yield one of our top V4 models, solidifying V4's main functional role in semantic processing and suggesting that V4's selectivity to 2D or 3D stimulus properties found by electrophysiologists can result from semantic functional goals.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNeural Networks, ComputerSemanticsVisual CortexAnimalsComputational BiologyMacacaMacaca mulattaNeuronsPhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID38781156
PMCPMC11115319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.