ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024
PallorMetrics: Software for Automatically Quantifying Optic Disc Pallor in Fundus Photographs, and Associations With Peripapillary RNFL Thickness.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Visual outcomes in thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy with no light perception.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Optic Disc Pallor in Parkinson's Disease: A UK Biobank Study.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025Article
- Can fundus features tell us something about 3D eye shape?Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025Article
- Association between optic disc pallor and lacunar stroke.BMJ neurology open · 2024Article
- Association of optic disc pallor and RNFL thickness with cerebral small vessel disease in the PREVENT-Dementia study.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
- Sectoral Changes in Neuroretinal Rim Pallor Across Refractive Error.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: We sough to develop an automatic method of quantifying optic disc pallor in fundus photographs and determine associations with peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness. Methods: We used deep learning to segment the optic disc, fovea, and vessels in fundus photographs, and measured pallor. We assessed the relationship between pallor and pRNFL thickness derived from optical coherence tomography scans in 118 participants. Separately, we used images diagnosed by clinical inspection as pale (n = 45) and assessed how measurements compared with healthy controls (n = 46). We also developed automatic rejection thresholds and tested the software for robustness to camera type, image format, and resolution. Results: We developed software that automatically quantified disc pallor across several zones in fundus photographs. Pallor was associated with pRNFL thickness globally (β = -9.81; standard error [SE] = 3.16; P < 0.05), in the temporal inferior zone (β = -29.78; SE = 8.32; P < 0.01), with the nasal/temporal ratio (β = 0.88; SE = 0.34; P < 0.05), and in the whole disc (β = -8.22; SE = 2.92; P < 0.05). Furthermore, pallor was significantly higher in the patient group. Last, we demonstrate the analysis to be robust to camera type, image format, and resolution. Conclusions: We developed software that automatically locates and quantifies disc pallor in fundus photographs and found associations between pallor measurements and pRNFL thickness. Translational Relevance: We think our method will be useful for the identification, monitoring, and progression of diseases characterized by disc pallor and optic atrophy, including glaucoma, compression, and potentially in neurodegenerative disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.