Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38780943›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2024

Effectiveness of a School- and Primary Care-Based HPV Vaccination Intervention: The PrevHPV Cluster Randomized Trial.

Nathalie Thilly, Morgane Michel, Maïa Simon, Aurélie Bocquier, Amandine Gagneux-Brunon, Aurélie Gauchet, Serge Gilberg, Anne-Sophie Le Duc-Banaszuk, Sébastien Bruel, Judith E Mueller and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04945655 (Impact of a School- and Primary Care-based Multicomponent Intervention on HPV Vaccination Acceptability Among French Adolescents), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04945655 nacompletednot on this map

Impact of a School- and Primary Care-based Multicomponent Intervention on HPV Vaccination Acceptability Among French Adolescents: a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, FranceRan2021 to 2023Enrolled30,739ConditionsHPV Vaccine AcceptabilityArmsAdolescents and parents' education and motivation at school (component 1), General practitioners' training (component 2), Access to vaccination at school (component 3)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. FIGO position statement on the effectiveness and safety of the HPV vaccine.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Nathalie ThillyUniversité de Lorraine, APEMAC, Nancy, France.
Morgane MichelUniversité Paris Cité, ECEVE, UMR 1123, Inserm, Paris, France.
Maïa SimonUniversité de Lorraine, APEMAC, Nancy, France.
Aurélie BocquierUniversité de Lorraine, APEMAC, Nancy, France.
Amandine Gagneux-BrunonCIC-1408 Vaccinologie, CHU de Saint-Etienne, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France.
Aurélie GauchetUniversité Savoie Mont Blanc, Université Grenoble Alpes, LIP/PC2S, Grenoble, France.
Serge GilbergDepartment of General Practice, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Anne-Sophie Le Duc-BanaszukCentre Régional de Coordination des Dépistages des cancers-Pays de la Loire, Angers, France.
Sébastien BruelDepartment of General Practice, Jacques Lisfranc Faculty of Medicine, Université Saint-Etienne-Lyon, Saint-Etienne, France.
Judith E MuellerEmerging Disease Epidemiology Unit, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Bruno GiraudeauUniversité de Tours, Université de Nantes, SPHERE U1246, Inserm, Tours, France.
Karine ChevreulUniversité Paris Cité, ECEVE, UMR 1123, Inserm, Paris, France.
PrevHPV Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine is safe and effective, yet vaccination coverage remains below public health objectives in many countries. Objective: To examine the effectiveness of a 3-component intervention on HPV vaccination coverage among adolescents aged 11 to 14 years 2 months after the intervention ended, each component being applied alone or in combination. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cluster randomized trial with incomplete factorial design (PrevHPV) was conducted between July 1, 2021, and April 30, 2022, in French municipalities receiving 0, 1, 2, or 3 components of the intervention. Randomization was stratified by school district and municipalities' socioeconomic level. Analyses were carried out on 11- to 14-year-old adolescents living in all participating municipalities, regardless of what had been implemented. Intervention: The PrevHPV intervention had 3 components: (1) educating and motivating 11- to 14-year-old adolescents in middle schools, along with their parents; (2) training general practitioners (GPs) on up-to-date HPV information and motivational interviewing techniques; and (3) free HPV vaccination at school. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was HPV vaccination coverage (≥1 dose) 2 months after the intervention ended among 11- to 14-year-old adolescents living in participating municipalities, based on the French national reimbursement database and data collected during the trial in groups randomized to implement at-school vaccination. Results: A total of 91 municipalities comprising 30 739 adolescents aged 11 to 14 years (15 876 boys and 14 863 girls) were included and analyzed. Half the municipalities were in the 2 lowest socioeconomic quintiles and access to GPs was poor in more than two-thirds of the municipalities. Thirty-eight of 61 schools (62.3%) implemented actions and 26 of 45 municipalities (57.8%) had at least 1 trained GP. The median vaccination coverage increased by 4.0 percentage points (IQR, 2.0-7.3 percentage points) to 14.2 percentage points (IQR, 9.1-17.3 percentage points) at 2 months. At-school vaccination significantly increased vaccination coverage (5.50 percentage points [95% CI, 3.13-7.88 percentage points]) while no effect was observed for adolescents' education and motivation (-0.08 percentage points [95% CI, -2.54 to 2.39 percentage points]) and GPs' training (-1.46 percentage points [95% CI, -3.44 to 0.53 percentage points]). Subgroup analyses found a significant interaction between at-school vaccination and access to GPs, with a higher effect when access was poor (8.62 percentage points [95% CI, 5.37-11.86 percentage points] vs 2.13 percentage points [95% CI, -1.25 to 5.50 percentage points]; P = .007 for interaction). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cluster randomized trial, within the context of the late COVID-19 pandemic period and limited school and GP participation, at-school HPV vaccination significantly increased vaccination coverage. The trial did not show a significant effect for training GPs and education and motivation, although it may be observed after more time has elapsed after the intervention. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04945655.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesPrimary Health CareAdolescentChildFemaleFranceHumansMaleSchool Health ServicesSchoolsVaccinationVaccination CoveragePapillomavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID38780943
PMCPMC11117086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.