ArticleJAMA network open2024
Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Total Knee Arthroplasty With or Without Antibiotic Bone Cement.
Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The application of antibiotic-loaded bone cement in preventing periprosthetic joint infection: an umbrella review.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2025Pooled it
- Leveraging Clinical Registries and Electronic Health Systems to Advance Value-Based Medicine Across Specialties.The Permanente journal · 2026Review
- A Novel Preoperative Calculator for 90-Day Prosthetic Joint Infection Following Total Joint Arthroplasty Based off the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative Database.Arthroplasty today · 2026Article
- Impact of Antibiotic Bone Cement on Infection Rates in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A GRADE-Assessed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies Involving Over 4 Million Patients.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Review
- Staphylococcus aureus periprosthetic joint infection and its pathogenesis in total hip and knee arthroplasty: a narrative review.EFORT open reviews · 2026Review
- Preoperative malnutrition and risk of re-revision and mortality following revision arthroplasty.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Dual-antibiotic bone cement (gentamicin + vancomycin) in preventing and treating infections during revision knee arthroplasty in high-risk patients.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Point-of-care bone cement based on natural peptide comonomer protects orthopaedic implants from bacterial challenge.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- No increased complications in hepatitis B positive patients undergoing total knee replacement: A systematic review and proportional meta-analysis.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Article
- The first causal inference analysis of the Catalan Arthroplasty Register shows a positive effect of antibiotic-loaded bone cement on knee prosthesis survival.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Beyond Cultures: The Evolving Role of Molecular Diagnostics, Synovial Biomarkers and Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infections.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Periprosthetic joint infection after arthroplasty: advances and future prospects.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Review
- Formulation and characterization of a sortase a inhibitor-loaded PMMA bone cement.RSC advances · 2025Article
- CORR Insights®: Does Cement Viscosity Impact Antibiotic Elution and In Vitro Efficacy Against Common Prosthetic Joint Infection Pathogens?Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2025Article
- High vs. low vancomycin therapeutic concentrations in periprosthetic joint infection: A retrospective cohort analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Antibiotic-loaded bone cement is associated with a reduction of the risk of revision of total knee arthroplasty: Analysis of the Catalan Arthroplasty Register.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025Article
- Clinical efficacy of antibiotic-loaded bone cement and negative pressure wound therapy in multidrug-resistant organisms diabetic foot ulcers: a retrospective analysis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024Article
- Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement and Risk of Infection After Knee Arthroplasty in High-Risk Patients: A Register Based Meta-Analysis.JB & JS open accessArticle
- Preoperative Oral Health Screening in Patients Undergoing Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Cross-Sectional Study.Current health sciences journalArticle
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
43 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Despite increased use of antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) in joint arthroplasty over recent decades, current evidence for prophylactic use of ALBC to reduce risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is insufficient. Objective: To compare the rate of revision attributed to PJI following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using ALBC vs plain bone cement. Design, Setting, and Participants: This international cohort study used data from 14 national or regional joint arthroplasty registries in Australia, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Italy, New Zealand, Norway, Romania, Sweden, Switzerland, the Netherlands, the UK, and the US. The study included primary TKAs for osteoarthritis registered from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2020, and followed-up until December 31, 2021. Data analysis was performed from April to September 2023. Exposure: Primary TKA with ALBC vs plain bone cement. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was risk of 1-year revision for PJI. Using a distributed data network analysis method, data were harmonized, and a cumulative revision rate was calculated (1 - Kaplan-Meier), and Cox regression analyses were performed within the 10 registries using both cement types. A meta-analysis was then performed to combine all aggregated data and evaluate the risk of 1-year revision for PJI and all causes. Results: Among 2 168 924 TKAs included, 93% were performed with ALBC. Most TKAs were performed in female patients (59.5%) and patients aged 65 to 74 years (39.9%), fully cemented (92.2%), and in the 2015 to 2020 period (62.5%). All participating registries reported a cumulative 1-year revision rate for PJI of less than 1% following primary TKA with ALBC (range, 0.21%-0.80%) and with plain bone cement (range, 0.23%-0.70%). The meta-analyses based on adjusted Cox regression for 1 917 190 TKAs showed no statistically significant difference at 1 year in risk of revision for PJI (hazard rate ratio, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.89-1.52) or for all causes (hazard rate ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.89-1.40) among TKAs performed with ALBC vs plain bone cement. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, the risk of revision for PJI was similar between ALBC and plain bone cement following primary TKA. Any additional costs of ALBC and its relative value in reducing revision risk should be considered in the context of the overall health care delivery system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.