ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2024
Pathomic model based on histopathological features and machine learning to predict IDO1 status and its association with breast cancer prognosis.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolic enzymes and immune receptors as emerging checkpoints in breast cancer: mechanisms, clinical trials, and therapeutic implications.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Integrated Network Pharmacology and Machine Learning to Reveal the Mechanisms of Schisandrin A Against Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Article
- Toward genomic personalization of breast cancer radiotherapy: foundations, challenges, and a roadmap for clinical integration.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Review
- Low Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase 1 Expression Enhances Dendritic Cells Response to Tumor Cells Against Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo establish a pathomic model using histopathological image features for predicting indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) status and its relationship with overall survival (OS) in breast cancer.
methodsA pathomic model was constructed using machine learning and histopathological images obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas database to predict IDO1 expression. The model performance was evaluated based on the area under the curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Prediction scores (PSes) were generated from the model and applied to divide the patients into two groups. Survival outcomes, gene set enrichment, immune microenvironment, and tumor mutations were assessed between the two groups.
resultsSurvival analysis followed by multivariate correction revealed that high IDO1 is a protective factor for OS. Further, the model was calibrated, and it exhibited good discrimination. Additionally, the DCA showed that the proposed model provided a good clinical net benefit. The Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a positive correlation between high PS and improved OS. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses demonstrated that PS is an independent protective factor for OS. Moreover, differentially expressed genes were enriched in various essential biological processes, including extracellular matrix receptor interaction, angiogenesis, transforming growth factor β signaling, epithelial mesenchymal transition, cell junction, tryptophan metabolism, and heme metabolic processes. PS was positively correlated with M1 macrophages, CD8 + T cells, T follicular helper cells, and tumor mutational burden.
conclusionThese results indicate the potential ability of the proposed pathomic model to predict IDO1 status and the OS of breast cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.