Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38780875›Full record

ArticleHealth care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy2024

Being a Doctor: From Treating Individual Patients to Maximising Community Health and Social Justice.

Suet Voon Yu, Gerlese S Åkerlind

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Suet Voon YuCollege of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7424-8629
Gerlese S ÅkerlindEmeritus Faculty, Centre for Educational Development and Academic Methods, Australian National University, Building 1c, 24 Balmain Crescent, Acton, 2601, Australia. Gerlese.Akerlind@anu.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3937-7732

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined variation in medical practitioners' practice-based conceptions of what it means to be a doctor, based on interviews with 30 clinicians who were also medical educators. Participants included general practitioners, surgeons and physicians (non-surgical specialists). Participants were asked to draw a concept map of 'being a doctor', followed by semi-structured interviews using a phenomenographic research design. Three conceptions were identified, varyingly focused on (1) treating patients' medical problems; (2) maximising patients' well-being; and (3) maximising community health. Each conception was distinguished by variation in awareness of six underlying dimensions of being a doctor: (1) doctors' actions; (2) treatment success; (3) patients' actions; (4) patients' well-being; (5) community needs; and (6) social justice. Whilst all participants included dimensions 1 and 2 in their described practice, numerous participants did not include dimensions 3 and 4, i.e. did not take the patients' role and the impact of patients' psychosocial context into account in their practice. This is concerning, especially amongst medical educators, given the widely acknowledged importance of patient-centred care in medical practice. Similarly, only some of the participants considered community health needs and felt a broader social responsibility beyond their responsibility to individual patients. These findings highlight aspects of the medical profession that need to be further emphasised in medical training and continuing professional development.

Indexed as

PhysiciansSocial JusticeAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMalePatient-Centered CarePhysician-Patient RelationsPublic HealthQualitative ResearchConceptionsMedical educationMedical practicePatient-centred carePhenomenographyProfessional development

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.