ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024
How to do RNA-RNA Interaction Prediction? A Use-Case Driven Handbook Using IntaRNA.
Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of Ultraviolet (UV) and Circular Dichroism (CD) Spectroscopies to Study RNA-RNA Interactions of Regulatory RNAs of Bacteriophage Origin.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- LncRNA-Protein Interactions: A Key to Deciphering LncRNA Mechanisms.Biomolecules · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computational prediction of RNA-RNA interactions (RRI) is a central methodology for the specific investigation of inter-molecular RNA interactions and regulatory effects of non-coding RNAs like eukaryotic microRNAs or prokaryotic small RNAs. Available methods can be classified according to their underlying prediction strategies, each implicating specific capabilities and restrictions often not transparent to the non-expert user. Within this work, we review seven classes of RRI prediction strategies and discuss the advantages and limitations of respective tools, since such knowledge is essential for selecting the right tool in the first place.Among the RRI prediction strategies, accessibility-based approaches have been shown to provide the most reliable predictions. Here, we describe how IntaRNA, as one of the state-of-the-art accessibility-based tools, can be applied in various use cases for the task of computational RRI prediction. Detailed hands-on examples for individual RRI predictions as well as large-scale target prediction scenarios are provided. We illustrate the flexibility and capabilities of IntaRNA through the examples. Each example is designed using real-life data from the literature and is accompanied by instructions on interpreting the respective results from IntaRNA output. Our use-case driven instructions enable non-expert users to comprehensively understand and utilize IntaRNA's features for effective RRI predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38780733What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.