ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024
RNA Secondary Structure Thermodynamics.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several different ways to predict RNA secondary structures have been suggested in the literature. Statistical methods, such as those that utilize stochastic context-free grammars (SCFGs), or approaches based on machine learning aim to predict the best representative structure for the underlying ensemble of possible conformations. Their parameters have therefore been trained on larger subsets of well-curated, known secondary structures. Physics-based methods, on the other hand, usually refrain from using optimized parameters. They model secondary structures from loops as individual building blocks which have been assigned a physical property instead: the free energy of the respective loop. Such free energies are either derived from experiments or from mathematical modeling. This rigorous use of physical properties then allows for the application of statistical mechanics to describe the entire state space of RNA secondary structures in terms of equilibrium probabilities. On that basis, and by using efficient algorithms, many more descriptors of the conformational state space of RNA molecules can be derived to investigate and explain the many functions of RNA molecules. Moreover, compared to other methods, physics-based models allow for a much easier extension with other properties that can be measured experimentally. For instance, small molecules or proteins can bind to an RNA and their binding affinity can be assessed experimentally. Under certain conditions, existing RNA secondary structure prediction tools can be used to model this RNA-ligand binding and to eventually shed light on its impact on structure formation and function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38780727What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.