Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38780675›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2024

Melanoma in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients.

Vernon K Sondak, Jane L Messina

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vernon K SondakDepartment of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, U.S.A.. vernon.sondak@moffitt.org.
Jane L MessinaDepartment of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, U.S.A.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewMelanoma in younger individuals has different clinical presentations, histologic characteristics and prognosis from older patients. This review summarizes key differences and important new insights into pediatric and young adult melanoma, as well as recent evolutions in treatment. RECENT

findingsMolecular techniques have improved the classification of melanocytic neoplasms, and are especially useful in the workup of the diagnostically challenging lesions frequent in this age group. Molecular evaluation highlights differences between melanoma and atypical lesions with Spitz-like morphology, and should routinely be incorporated for diagnosing and classifying Spitzoid melanocytic to guide prognostication and treatment. Once diagnosed, the management of bona fide melanoma in children and young adults is largely similar to older patients, while the optimal management of lesions such as atypical Spitz tumors remains uncertain. Increased awareness of the presentation and diagnostic characteristics of melanoma in young individuals will allow earlier detection, and improved diagnostic techniques will allow optimum management without over- or under-treatment.

Indexed as

MelanomaSkin NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultChildHumansNevus, Epithelioid and Spindle CellPrognosisYoung AdultAtypical Spitz tumorMelanomaMolecular classificationMolecular diagnosticsPediatricsSpitz nevus

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.