Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38780673›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2024

Extending the PROMIS item bank "ability to participate in social roles and activities": a psychometric evaluation using IRT.

Guido L Williams, Gerard Flens, Caroline B Terwee, Edwin de Beurs, Philip Spinhoven, Muirne C S Paap

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Measurement properties of the USER-Participation Restriction subscale and PROMISQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Guido L WilliamsLMcare, Zwolle, The Netherlands. williamsgl@vuw.leidenuniv.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8008-5750
Gerard FlensQuality Alliance Mental Health, Akwa GGZ, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6683-4628
Caroline B TerweeDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4570-2826
Edwin de BeursInstitute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3832-8477
Philip SpinhovenInstitute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4117-335X
Muirne C S PaapDepartment of Child and Family Welfare, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1173-7070

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOur objective was to explore whether the extension of the PROMIS item bank Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities (APSRA) with new items would result in more effective targeting (i.e., selecting items that are appropriate for each individual's trait level), and more reliable measurements across all latent trait levels.

methodsA sample of 1,022 Dutch adults completed all 35 items of the original item bank plus 17 new items (in Dutch). The new items presented in this publication have been translated provisionally from Dutch into English for presentation purposes. We evaluated the basic IRT assumptions unidimensionality, local independence, and monotonicity. Furthermore, we examined the item parameters, and assessed differential item functioning (DIF) for sex, education, region, age, and ethnicity. In addition, we compared the test information functions, item parameters, and θ scores, for the original and extended item bank in order to assess whether the measurement range had improved.

resultsWe found that the extended item bank was compatible with the basic IRT assumptions and showed good reliability. Moreover, the extended item bank improved the measurement in the lower trait range, which is important for reliably assessing functioning in clinical populations (i.e., persons reporting lower levels of participation).

conclusionWe extended the PROMIS-APSRA item bank and improved its psychometric quality. Our study contributes to PROMIS measurement innovation, which allows for the addition of new items to existing item banks, without changing the interpretation of the scores and while maintaining the comparability of the scores with other PROMIS instruments.

Indexed as

PsychometricsAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSocial ParticipationSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAssessmentCATIRTPROMIS-APSRAPsychometric properties

Identifiers

PMID38780673
PMCPMC11286634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.