Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38780124›Full record

ReviewThe oncologist2024

Opioid metabolism and drug-drug interaction in cancer.

Matti Aapro, Stefano Fogli, Bart Morlion, Romano Danesi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The oncologist, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Methadone for intractable cancer pain associated with pelvic floor lesions: a retrospective analysis of 36 cases.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  8. Considerations for Care of the Cancer Patient.International anesthesiology clinics · 2025
    Article
  9. Buprenorphine: Applications in Oncology and Palliative Care.Clinical journal of oncology nursing · 2025
    Article
  10. Review of the Interactions Between Anesthetic Agents and Chemotherapeutic Agents in Cancer Cell Lines Studied In Vitro.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matti AaproGenolier Cancer Centre, Clinique de Genolier, 1272 Genolier, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3570-8319
Stefano FogliDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa PI, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7845-2598
Bart MorlionDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Section Anesthesiology and Algology, University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6156-880X
Romano DanesiDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, 20122 Milano MI, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4414-8934

Funding

Mundipharma Research Limited
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concomitant use of multiple drugs in most patients with cancer may result in drug-drug interactions (DDIs), potentially causing serious adverse effects. These patients often experience unrelieved cancer-related pain (CRP) during and after cancer treatment, which can lead to a reduced quality of life. Opioids can be used as part of a multimodal pain management strategy when non-opioid analgesics are not providing adequate pain relief, not tolerated, or are contraindicated. However, due to their narrow therapeutic window, opioids are more susceptible to adverse events when a DDI occurs. Clinically relevant DDIs with opioids are usually pharmacokinetic, mainly occurring via metabolism by cytochrome P450 (CYP). This article aims to provide an overview of potential DDIs with opioids often used in the treatment of moderate-to-severe CRP and commonly used anticancer drugs such as chemotherapeutics, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), or biologics. A DDI-checker tool was used to contextualize the tool-informed DDI assessment outcomes with clinical implications and practice. The findings were compared to observations from a literature search conducted in Embase and PubMed to identify clinical evidence for these potential DDIs. The limited results mainly included case studies and retrospective reviews. Some potential DDIs on the DDI-checker were aligned with literature findings, while others were contradictory. In conclusion, while DDI-checkers are useful tools in identifying potential DDIs, it is necessary to incorporate literature verification and comprehensive clinical assessment of the patient before implementing tool-informed decisions in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidDrug InteractionsNeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsCancer PainHumansAnalgesics, OpioidAntineoplastic Agentsanalgesicsanticancer drugsdrug-drug interactionsdrug interaction checkeropioidpain

Identifiers

PMID38780124
PMCPMC11546622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.