Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38779915›Full record

ArticleThe Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology2024

Redesigning antenatal care: Prospective use of an implementation framework to establish a population-based multidisciplinary first-trimester screening, assessment and prevention service.

Ailsa Borbolla Foster, Jennifer Haxton, Nicole Bennett, Jon Hyett, Felicity Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ailsa Borbolla FosterDepartment of Maternity and Gynaecology, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Hts, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4954-0449
Jennifer HaxtonDepartment of Maternity and Gynaecology, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Hts, New South Wales, Australia.
Nicole BennettDepartment of Maternity and Gynaecology, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Hts, New South Wales, Australia.
Jon HyettIngham Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.
Felicity ParkDepartment of Maternity and Gynaecology, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Hts, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

Hunter New England Local Health District
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAustralian rates of adverse obstetric outcomes have improved little despite guidelines recommending history-based screening and intervention. The first trimester provides a unique opportunity to predict and prevent complications, yet population-based screening has failed to be translated into broad clinical practice.

aimsThis study aimed to redesign antenatal care within an Australian public healthcare centre to align with evidence-based maternity care, including population-based first-trimester screening with early initiation of preventative strategies in high-risk pregnancies.

methodsA five-phase action-process model, sharing key elements with implementation science theory, was used to explore barriers to change in antenatal care, co-design a novel service with consumers and establish a population-based antenatal pathway commencing with a multidisciplinary first-trimester screening, assessment and planning visit.

resultsThe case for change and associated barriers were defined from the perspective of antenatal care stakeholders. Key needs of each group were established, and solutions were created using co-design methodology, allowing the team to create a novel approach to antenatal care which directly addressed identified barriers. Implementation of the service was associated with a fall in the median gestation at first specialist maternity care provider visit from 20 to 13 weeks.

conclusionsThis study confirms the feasibility of establishing a comprehensive first-trimester screening program within a public Australian healthcare setting and highlights a co-design process which places individualised assessment at the forefront of antenatal care. This framework may be applicable to most public maternity settings in Australia, with expansion aimed at providing equity of care, including in rural and remote settings.

Indexed as

Pregnancy Trimester, FirstPrenatal CareAdultAustraliaFemaleHumansMass ScreeningPregnancyPregnancy, High-RiskPrenatal DiagnosisProspective Studiesimplementation sciencepre‐eclampsiaprenatal careprenatal diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID38779915
PMCPMC11683758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.