Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38779905›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental dermatology2024

Artificial intelligence algorithms and three-dimensional volumetric rendering for basal cell carcinoma detection and tumour depth assessment in reflectance confocal microscopy-optical coherence tomography images: a pilot study.

Alexander Pan, Nathalie de Carvalho, Luisa Silva, Ucalene Harris, Stephen Dusza, Aditi Sahu, Kivanc Kose, Jilliana Monnier, Chih-Shan Chen, Manu Jain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental dermatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alexander PanDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7277-1109
Nathalie de CarvalhoDepartment of Dermatology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Luisa SilvaDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Ucalene HarrisDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Stephen DuszaDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Aditi SahuDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Kivanc KoseDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Jilliana MonnierDepartment of Dermatology and Skin Cancers, La Timone Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Chih-Shan ChenDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Manu JainDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Summer research experiences for medical students supervised by faculty mentorsR25CA020449 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Charlotte Eielson Ariyan · 1985 to 2026
$6.2M
following 5R25CA020449NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R25 CA020449NIH HHS P30-CA008748the
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM)-optical coherence tomography (OCT) device has shown utility in detecting and assessing the depth of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) in vivo but is challenging for novices to interpret. Artificial intelligence (AI) applied to RCM-OCT could aid readers. We trained AI models, using OCT rasters of biopsy-confirmed BCC, to detect BCC, create three-dimensional rendering and automatically measure tumour depth. Trained AI models were applied to a separate test set containing rasters of BCC, benign lesions, and healthy skin. Blinded reader analysis and tumour depth correlation with histopathology were conducted. BCC detection improved from viewing OCT rasters only (sensitivity 73.3%, specificity 45.5%) to viewing rasters with AI-generated BCC rendering (sensitivity 86.7%, specificity 48.5%). A Pearson correlation r2 = 0.59 (P = 0.02) was achieved for the tumour depth measurement between AI and histological measured depths. Thus, addition of AI to the RCM-OCT device may expand its utility widely.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceBasal Cell CarcinomaMicroscopy, ConfocalSkin NeoplasmsTomography, Optical CoherenceFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalPilot ProjectsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID38779905
PMCPMC11500700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.