Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38779876›Full record

Trial reportJournal of global health2024

Randomised experimental evaluation of a social media campaign to promote COVID-19 vaccination in Nigeria.

William D Evans, Jeffrey B Bingenheimer, Michael W Long, Khadidiatou Ndiaye, Dante Donati, Nandan M Rao, Selinam Akaba, Sohail Agha

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

William D EvansMilken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington D.C., USA.
Jeffrey B BingenheimerMilken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington D.C., USA.
Michael W LongMilken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington D.C., USA.
Khadidiatou NdiayeMilken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington D.C., USA.
Dante DonatiSchool of Business, Columbia University, New York, USA.
Nandan M RaoVirtual Lab LLC, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Selinam AkabaMilken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington D.C., USA.
Sohail AghaBehavioral Insights Lab, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has challenged public health and behaviour change programmes, and has led to the development of innovative interventions and research. In low -and middle-income countries (LMICs) such as Nigeria, new strategies to promote vaccination, increase pro-vaccination social norms, and reduce vaccine hesitancy have been deployed through social media campaigns and evaluated using digital media platforms. Methods: We conducted two randomised experimental evaluations of social media content designed to promote COVID-19 vaccination and to complement research on a nationwide vaccination promotion campaign in Nigeria run in 2022. We conducted two studies in March and August 2022 among Nigerians drawn from 31 states that had not been targeted in the aforementioned nationwide campaign. We randomised the participants to either receive the pro-vaccination social media campaign or not and collected data at pre- and post-test time points to evaluate psychosocial predictors of vaccination and vaccination outcomes following the Theory of Change based on Diffusion of Innovations; the Social Norms Theory, and the Motivation, Opportunity, Ability (MOA) framework. Data were collected through a novel intervention delivery and data collection platform through social media. Results: We found that pro-vaccination social norms and vaccination rates increased, while vaccine hesitancy decreased among participants randomised to the social media intervention study arm. Conclusions: Social media campaigns are a promising approach to increasing vaccination at scale in LMICs, while social norms are an important factor in promoting vaccination, which is consistent with the Social Norms Theory. This study demonstrates the capability and potential of new social media-based data collection techniques. We describe implications for future vaccination campaigns and identify future research priorities in this area. Registration: Pan African Clinical Trial Registry: PACTR202310811597445.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHealth PromotionSocial MediaAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansImmunization ProgramsMaleMiddle AgedNigeriaVaccinationVaccination HesitancyYoung AdultCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID38779876
PMCPMC11112529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.