Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38779826›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2024

A Pilot Study to Evaluate the Use of Automated Nicotine Metabolite Ratio Reporting Within Primary Care as an Implementation Strategy to Increase the Use of Tobacco Treatments.

Robert Schnoll, Frank T Leone, Anna-Marika Bauer, E Paul Wileyto, Colin Wollack, Nathaniel Stevens, Daniel Blumenthal, Casey Foster, Fodie Koita, Julia Villasenor and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Robert SchnollDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4089-856X
Frank T LeonePulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Division, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Anna-Marika BauerDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
E Paul WileytoDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Colin WollackPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Nathaniel StevensDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Daniel BlumenthalDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Casey FosterDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Fodie KoitaDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Julia VillasenorDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Brian P JenssenDepartment of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6082-4931

Funding

A Patient-Oriented Research Mentoring Program in Tobacco Dependence ResearchK24DA045244 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Robert Adam Schnoll · 2018 to 2026
$1.7M
NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA045244NIDA NIH HHS K24DA045244
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionConcerns about safety and effectiveness of tobacco treatments reduce their use. We explored integrating the nicotine metabolite ratio (NMR), and messaging about its potential for improving safety and effectiveness, as a strategy to increase the use of tobacco treatments within primary care. AIMS AND

methodsThrough a prospective cohort design, we explored the effects of integrating NMR testing within primary care on the provision of tobacco treatment; 65 patients completed assessments including NMR before a clinic visit. At the clinic visit, patients' clinicians received an electronic health record (EHR) alert about the patient's NMR and personalized treatment recommendations to improve effectiveness and safety. Being asked about smoking and advised to quit, and a referral for tobacco treatment or medication prescription, were assessed within 30 days of the appointment and were compared to a usual care cohort (N = 85).

resultsThe NMR and usual care cohorts reported similar rates of being asked about smoking (92.3% vs. 92.9%, p = 1.0), being advised to quit (72.3% vs. 74.1%, p = .85), being referred for tobacco treatment (23.1% vs. 36.5%, p = .11), and receiving tobacco use medications (20% vs. 27.1%, p = .34). In the NMR cohort, fast versus slow metabolizers were more likely to receive medication (26% vs. 0%, p = .003) and all patients who received varenicline (n = 8) were fast metabolizers.

conclusionsNMR results and treatment recommendations did not increase tobacco treatment rates in primary care, although it may increase treatment rates and the use of varenicline for fast metabolizers. Future studies could test ways to use the NMR to increase tobacco treatment rates in clinical settings. IMPLICATIONS: This study generated a novel implementation strategy, namely an EHR alert about patients' NMR and personalized treatment recommendations, in an effort to increase tobacco treatment rates in primary care. While the strategy did not increase tobacco treatment rates, it may have boosted the rate of varenicline prescription for patients who metabolize nicotine faster, aligning with evidence-based practice.

Indexed as

NicotinePrimary Health CareSmoking CessationAdultElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesNicotine

Identifiers

PMID38779826
PMCPMC11494467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.