Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38779809›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and psychiatric sciences2024

Mortality risk and mood stabilizers in bipolar disorder: a propensity-score-weighted population-based cohort study in 2002-2018.

Joe Kwun Nam Chan, Corine Sau Man Wong, Catherine Zhiqian Fang, Samson Chun Hung, Heidi Ka Ying Lo, Wing Chung Chang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. History of Suicide Prevention with Lithium Treatment.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Biomarkers of cognitive and memory decline in psychotropic drug users.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joe Kwun Nam ChanDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Clinical medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Corine Sau Man WongSchool of Public Health, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Catherine Zhiqian FangDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Clinical medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Samson Chun HungDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Clinical medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Heidi Ka Ying LoDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Clinical medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Wing Chung ChangDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Clinical medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3581-8895

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsAccumulating studies have assessed mortality risk associated with mood-stabilizers, the mainstay treatment for bipolar disorder (BD). However, existing data were mostly restricted to suicide risk, focused on lithium and valproate and rarely adequately adjusted for potential confounders. This study aimed to assess comparative mortality risk with all, natural and unnatural causes between lithium, valproate and three frequently prescribed second-generation antipsychotics (SGA), with adjustment for important confounders.

methodsThis population-based cohort study identified 8137 patients with first-diagnosed BD, who had exposed to lithium (

resultsIncidence rates of all-cause mortality per 1000 person-years were 5.9 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.5-7.6), 8.4 (7.4-9.5), 11.1 (8.3-14.9), 7.4 (6.0-9.2) and 12.0 (9.3-15.6) for lithium-, valproate-, olanzapine-, quetiapine- and risperidone-treated groups, respectively. BD patients treated with olanzapine (PS-weighted hazard ratio = 2.07 [95% CI: 1.33-3.22]) and risperidone (1.66 [1.08-2.55]) had significantly higher all-cause mortality rate than lithium-treated group. Olanzapine was associated with increased risk of natural-cause mortality (3.04 [1.54-6.00]) and risperidone was related to elevated risk of unnatural-cause mortality (3.33 [1.62-6.86]), relative to lithium. The association between olanzapine and increased natural-cause mortality rate was consistently affirmed in sensitivity analyses. Relationship between risperidone and elevated unnatural-cause mortality became non-significant in sensitivity analyses restricted to low MPR in other mood-stabilizers and monotherapy. Valproate- and lithium-treated groups did not show significant differences in all-, natural- or unnatural-cause mortality risk.

conclusionOur data showed that olanzapine and risperidone were associated with higher mortality risk than lithium, and further supported the clinical guidelines recommending lithium as the first-line mood-stabilizer for BD. Future research is required to further clarify comparative mortality risk associated with individual SGA agents to facilitate risk-benefit evaluation of alternative mood-stabilizers to minimize avoidable premature mortality in BD.

Indexed as

Antimanic AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsBipolar DisorderPropensity ScoreQuetiapine FumarateValproic AcidAdultCause of DeathCohort StudiesFemaleHong KongHumansLithiumMaleMiddle AgedOlanzapineAntimanic AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsLithiumOlanzapineQuetiapine FumarateRisperidoneValproic Acidbipolar disorderlithiummood stabilizersmortalitypopulation-basedsecond-generation antipsychotics

Identifiers

PMID38779809
PMCPMC11362685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.