Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38779669›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2024

The alterations of oral, airway and intestine microbiota in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ziwei Kou, Kai Liu, Zhengtong Qiao, Yaoyao Wang, Yanmiao Li, Yinan Li, Xinjuan Yu, Wei Han

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ziwei Kou *Department of Medicine, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Kai Liu *Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Zhengtong QiaoSchool of Rehabilitation Medical, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai, China.
Yaoyao WangDepartment of Medicine, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Yanmiao LiDepartment of Medicine, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Yinan LiDepartment of Medicine, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Xinjuan YuClinical Research Center, Qingdao Key Laboratory of Common Diseases, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Wei HanDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Medicine, Qingdao Key Laboratory of Common Diseases, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Qingdao, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Increasing evidence indicates the microbial ecology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is intricately associated with the disease's status and severity, and distinct microbial ecological variations exist between COPD and healthy control (HC). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize microbial diversity indices and taxa relative abundance of oral, airway, and intestine microbiota of different stages of COPD and HC to make comparisons. Methods: A comprehensive systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases to identify relevant English articles on the oral, airway, and intestine microbiota in COPD published between 2003 and 8 May 2023. Information on microbial diversity indices and taxa relative abundance of oral, airway, and intestine microbiota was collected for comparison between different stages of COPD and HC. Results: A total of 20 studies were included in this review, involving a total of 337 HC participants, 511 COPD patients, and 154 AECOPD patients. We observed that no significant differences in alpha diversity between the participant groups, but beta diversity was significantly different in half of the included studies. Compared to HC, Conclusion: The majority of published research findings supported that COPD exhibited decreased alpha diversity compared to HC. However, our meta-analysis does not confirm it. In order to further investigate the characteristics and mechanisms of microbiome in the oral-airway- intestine axis of COPD patients, larger-scale and more rigorous studies are needed. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/), identifier CRD42023418726.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveBacteriaHumansMicrobiotaMouthalpha-diversitybeta-diversitychronic obstructive respiratory diseasehuman airway microbiomehuman intestine microbiomehuman oral microbiomemeta-analysisrelative abundance

Identifiers

PMID38779669
PMCPMC11109405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.