ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024
Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy plus immunotherapy for locally resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy Versus Chemoradiation Combined with Immunotherapy in Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- ASO Author Reflections: Adding Radiotherapy to Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy Improves Pathological Response but not Short‑Term Survival in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradioimmunotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Spatial distribution analysis of tertiary lymphoid structures in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma predicts patient survival and response to neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Overcoming chemoresistance in esophageal cancer with synergistic strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Neoadjuvant therapy-associated malignant phenotype score predicts prognosis and highlights the roles of MIF signaling and DUXAP8 in ESCC.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Preoperative radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (nCT + ICIs) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus immunotherapy (nCRT + ICIs) both induced favorable pathological response and tolerant toxicities for locally resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, few studies compared safety and efficacy between the two treatment strategies. Methods: This retrospective study collected clinical data of locally resectable ESCC patients who underwent nCT + ICIs or nCRT + ICIs followed by esophagectomy from November 2019 to December 2022. The incidence of adverse events, surgical outcomes, short and long-term efficacy, and treatment costs were compared. Results: A total of 206 patients were included, with a ratio of 158:48 between nCT + ICIs group and nCRT + ICIs group. The two groups exhibited well-balanced baseline characteristics. Most adverse events were grade 1-2 in both groups. The nCT + ICIs group had a longer operative time (334.00 ± 170.2 min vs 279.60 ± 88.31 min, Conclusion: Overall, nCT + ICIs have comparable safety and efficacy compared to nCRT + ICIs for locally resectable ESCC, but with lower hospitalization costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.