ArticleAnnals of gastroenterology
Impact of blood transfusion on mortality and rebleeding in gastrointestinal bleeding: an 8-year cohort from a tertiary care center.
Article in Annals of gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determinants of clinical outcome after transarterial embolization for nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective cohort study.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Clinical Impact of Red Blood Cell Transfusion Location on Gastrointestinal Bleeding Outcomes: Emergency Department vs. Inpatient Unit.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Biopsy-Proven Gastric Pathological Findings in Mechanically Ventilated Intensive Care Unit Patients.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of blood transfusion (BT) on mortality and rebleeding in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) and whether BT at a threshold of ≤7 g/dL may improve these outcomes. Methods: A prospective study was conducted in patients admitted with GIB between 2013 and 2021. Antithrombotic (AT) use and clinical outcomes were compared between transfused and non-transfused patients, and between those transfused at a threshold of ≤7 vs. >7 g/dL. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of mortality and rebleeding. Results: A total of 667 patients, including 383 transfused, were followed up for a median of 56 months. Predictors of end-of-follow-up mortality included: age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH), and being on anticoagulants only upon presentation (P=0.026). SRH was a predictor of end-of-follow-up rebleeding, while having been on only antiplatelet therapy (AP) upon presentation was protective (P<0.001). BT was not associated with mortality or rebleeding at 1 month or end of follow up. Among transfused patients, being discharged only on AP protected against mortality (P=0.044). BT at >7 g/dL did not affect the risk of short or long-term rebleeding or mortality compared to BT at ≤7 g/dL. Conclusions: Short- and long-term mortality and rebleeding in GIB were not affected by BT, nor by a transfusion threshold of ≤7 vs. >7 g/dL, but were affected by the use of AT. Further studies that account for AT use are needed to determine the best transfusion strategy in GIB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.