ArticleNursing research and practice2024
Undergraduate Nursing Students' Experiences of Virtual Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Nursing research and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: With the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic, schools and universities were closed, and virtual education replaced face-to-face classes. This learning method was a new and different experience for nursing students. Perceiving their experiences could help improve the quality of medical education. Therefore, the present study aimed to describe nursing students' experiences of virtual learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods: This study involved qualitative descriptive research that was conducted in 2022. The participants included 25 undergraduate nursing students studying at the School of Nursing and Midwifery in East Guilan in northern Iran who had experienced virtual learning due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Purposeful sampling was applied until data saturation. Qualitative content analysis with a conventional approach was performed based on the model proposed by Graneheim and Lundman (2004). Coding was performed with MAXQDA 2007 software. Results: The data analysis led to the emergence of 110 primary codes and two main categories entitled "positive experiences" and "negative experiences." The first main category was "positive experiences" (included 1 subcategory (benefits of virtual learning) with 3 subsubcategories (saving time, saving money, and increasing the possibility of daily planning)). The second main category was "negative experiences" (included 4 subcategories (reducing quality of education, physical effects, psychological effects, and different exams)). Conclusion: Nursing students had both positive and negative experiences with virtual learning during the COVID-19 pandemic and were facing multiple educational challenges. The findings of this study could be considered by managers and relevant officials in educational planning to improve the quality of nursing education.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.