Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38779551›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2024

Working memory and inhibitory control deficits in children with ADHD: an experimental evaluation of competing model predictions.

Michael J Kofler, Nicole B Groves, Elizabeth S M Chan, Carolyn L Marsh, Alissa M Cole, Fatou Gaye, Enrique Cibrian, Miho O Tatsuki, Leah J Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michael J KoflerDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.
Nicole B GrovesDepartment of Psychiatry, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, United States.
Elizabeth S M ChanGraduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.
Carolyn L MarshDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.
Alissa M ColeDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.
Fatou GayeDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.
Enrique CibrianDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.
Miho O TatsukiDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.
Leah J SinghDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.

Funding

Evaluating the Efficacy of Central Executive Training (CET) for ADHDR01MH115048 · NIMH · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KOFLER, MICHAEL J · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH115048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Children with ADHD demonstrate difficulties on many different neuropsychological tests. However, it remains unclear whether this pattern reflects a large number of distinct deficits or a small number of deficit(s) that broadly impact test performance. The current study is among the first experiments to systematically manipulate demands on both working memory and inhibition, with implications for competing conceptual models of ADHD pathogenesis. Method: A clinically evaluated, carefully phenotyped sample of 110 children with ADHD, anxiety disorders, or co-occurring ADHD+anxiety ( Results: Bayesian and frequentist models converged in indicating that both manipulations successfully increased demands on their target executive function (BF Discussion: This pattern indicates that working memory broadly affects children's ability to inhibit prepotent tendencies and maintain fast/accurate performance, and may explain the errors that children with ADHD make on inhibition tests. These findings are broadly consistent with models describing working memory as a causal mechanism that gives rise to secondary impairments. In contrast, these findings provide evidence

Indexed as

ADHDanxietyexperimental psychopathologyinhibitionworking memory

Identifiers

PMID38779551
PMCPMC11110569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.