Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38779536›Full record

ArticleRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2024

[Mental Health Gap Action Programme: a theoretical model of barriers to implementation by health personnel in Chocó, ColombiaPrograma de Ação para Reduzir as Lacunas em Saúde Mental: modelo teórico das barreiras de implementação por profissionais de saúde de Chocó, Colômbia].

Felipe Agudelo-Hernández, Laura Plata-Casas, Helena Vélez Botero, Luz María Salazar Vieira, Bibian Moreno Mayorga

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mental health risk communication and community participation among an Indigenous people in Colombia.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2025
    Article
  6. "Razones para Vivir": Hybrid implementation study in Colombia for health governance and improving suicidal behavior.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Felipe Agudelo-HernándezFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud Universidad de Manizales Caldas Colombia Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Manizales, Caldas, Colombia.
Laura Plata-CasasMinisterio de Salud y Protección Social Bogotá Colombia Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social, Bogotá, Colombia.
Helena Vélez BoteroUniversidad Nacional de Colombia Bogotá Colombia Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Luz María Salazar VieiraUniversidad Nacional de Colombia Bogotá Colombia Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Bibian Moreno MayorgaMinisterio de Salud y Protección Social Bogotá Colombia Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social, Bogotá, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Mental, neurological, and substance use (MNS) disorders have a high prevalence in Colombia and there is a treatment gap. The World Health Organization (WHO) Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) has various components. The mhGAP 2.0 Intervention Guide, aimed at improving primary health care, is a guide for the assessment and management of MNS disorders based on clinical decision-making protocols. The objective of this study was to determine the barriers that may hinder the program implementation process. Methods: A qualitative study with content analysis was conducted in three phases: i) study preparation, organization, and presentation; ii) open coding, categorization, and abstraction of contents; and iii) information analysis. The study included semi-structured interviews with 21 people involved in the provision of mental health services in Chocó (Colombia): five medical doctors, seven nurses, and three psychologists, as well as six professionals working in the administrative area of the department's health secretariats. The perceptions of these stakeholders were explored. Open-ended questions were asked to explore experiences with the process, as well as the barriers identified in practice. Results: Four different thematic categories were identified: intersectoral action, long-standing challenges, opportunities, and suitability of tools. Conclusions: A theoretical model of barriers to implementation of the mhGAP program was constructed, based on stakeholder perceptions. Controlling barriers is perceived as a possible way to contribute significantly to population health.

Indexed as

barriers to access of health servicesColombiamental healthModels, theoreticalprimary health care

Identifiers

PMID38779536
PMCPMC11110682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.