ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2024
A Multicentric and Retrospective Clinical Study: 2 Year Follow-up Results for Breast Surgery With Perle Smooth Opaque Silicone Breast Implants.
Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Breast Implants: Low Rate of Annual Check-Ups Results in Delayed Presentation of Ruptured Implants.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: For breast surgery, there are a number of implants available that offer different options, such as shape, surface characteristics, gel fillers, and size/profile to meet the diverse needs of the patient population. Each implant option has its own advantages and disadvantages, and the individual patient's needs should be taken into account when making choices. Objectives: To conduct an assessment of the safety, performance, and satisfaction rates through a 2-year follow-up study for the Perle mammary implant (Nagor Ltd, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom). Methods: A retrospective, observational, multicenter, noncomparative study was conducted from March 2023 to June 2023. The collection of data took place in 5 centers across France and Italy. Patients included in the study received the evaluated device between October 2020 and June 2021 for cosmetic and medical indications. Results: Of the 97 patients included in the study, only 9 patients reported complications during the 2 years following the surgery. The overall complication rate was 9.28%. All patients and surgeons were satisfied or very satisfied with the surgery and the implant. Conclusions: This patient cohort showed a rate of complications consistent with the range of other smooth implants after 2 years of follow-up and a high rate of both patient and surgeon satisfaction. Level of Evidence 4:
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.