ArticleMethodsX2024
Segmentation of stunting, wasting, and underweight in Southeast Sulawesi using geographically weighted multivariate Poisson regression.
Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Estimation of parameters and hypothesis testing of multivariate spatial autoregressive model.MethodsX · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The health profile of Southeast Sulawesi Province in 2021 shows that the prevalence of stunting is 11.69 %, wasting 5.89 % and underweight 7.67 %. This relatively high figure should be immediately reduced to zero because it greatly affects the quality of human resources. Cases of stunting, wasting and underweight are an iceberg phenomenon, especially in Southeast Sulawesi. Therefore, it is necessary to research the number of cases of stunting, wasting and underweight in Southeast Sulawesi using GWMPR. The research results show that there is a trivariate correlation between the number of cases of stunting, wasting and underweight. The GWMPR model provides better results in modeling the number of stunting, wasting and underweight cases than the MPR model. The models produced for each sub-district are different from each other based on the predictor variables that have a significant effect and the estimated parameter values for each sub-district. The segmentation of the number of stunting cases consists of 21 regional groups with 10 significant predictor variables, while the number of wasting cases consists of 10 regional groups with 9 significant predictor variables, while the number of underweight cases consists of 37 regional groups with 11 significant predictor variables. Therefore, policies on stunting, wasting, and underweight should be based on local conditions. 3 important components of this study: 1. GWMPR is the development of GWPR model when there are 2 or more response variables that are correlated. 2. GWMPR is a spatial model that considers geography. 3. Application of GWMPR to the analysis of the number of stunting, wasting, and underweight in Southeast Sulawesi province.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.