Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38779374›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2024

Microinjection Technique: A Novel and Comprehensive Approach for Nose Reshaping with Hyaluronic Acid Fillers.

Cemre Busra Turk, Bugra Burc Dagtas, Neslihan Fisek Izci, Gonca Gokdemir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cemre Busra TurkDr. Turk is with the Wellman Center for Photomedicine at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, and Department of Dermatology at Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts.
Bugra Burc DagtasDr. Dagtas is with the University of Health Sciences at the Istanbul Training and Research Hospital and Dermatology Clinic in Istanbul, Turkey.
Neslihan Fisek IzciDr. Izci is with the Faculty of Medicine and Department of Dermatology at Bahcesehir University in Istanbul, Turkey.
Gonca GokdemirDr. Gokdemir is with Prof. Dr. Gonca Gokdemir Clinic in Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Nose reshaping with hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers, also known as medical rhinoplasty, is an increasingly popular, minimally invasive aesthetic procedure. As the demand for nasal reshaping continues to rise, it is essential to develop safe and efficient injection techniques and assess satisfaction to ensure optimal outcomes and patient-centered care. Objective: This study aims to evaluate patient and physician satisfaction with hyaluronic acid filler applications using microinjection technique for nasal reshaping. Methods: The study included healthy adult patients who underwent medical rhinoplasty with the same HA filler using the microinjection technique. Patient satisfaction levels were evaluated at one and six months after the last injection using the Global Patient Satisfaction Scale (GPSS). Additionally, an independent dermatologist conducted a clinical evaluation for each patient by comparing before and after clinical pictures, using the Aesthetic Improvement Scale (AIS). Any side effects were recorded during each session and follow-up period for six months. Results: A total of 40 patients (37 women and 3 men) participated in the study. The most frequently targeted anatomical areas for filler injections were the nasal tip (100%), columella (100%), nasal prominence (100%), nasal dorsum (85%), and nasal root (82.5%). Injections distal to the nasolabial fold (NFL) were performed in 2.5 percent of patients. Patients expressed high satisfaction with the results at both one and six months after the procedure (mean GPSS, respectively; 4.65 and 4.47). Similarly, clinicians reported satisfaction with outcomes at the same time points (mean AIS, respectively; 1.7 and 1.4). Apart from mild pain during the procedure and transient erythema afterward, no side effects were recorded. Conclusion: Medical rhinoplasty with HA fillers using the microinjection technique is an effective and reliable procedure. This technique provides safe and aesthetically pleasing results from both patient and dermatologist perspectives, making it a favorable option for nasal reshaping with HA dermal fillers.

Indexed as

Dermal fillerfiller techniqueshyaluronic acid fillersmedical rhinoplastynose reshaping

Identifiers

PMID38779374
PMCPMC11107901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.