Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38779309›Full record

ArticleForensic science international. Synergy2024

Optimization of Postprocessing parameters for abdominal Forensic CT scans.

Pernille Lund Hansen, Peter Mygind Leth, Pernille Aagaard Nielsen, Dina Maria Bech, Julie Brandhøj Nielsen, Svea Deppe Mørup, Anette Koch Holst, Lene Bak, Mette R Poulsen, Pernille W Greisen and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science international. Synergy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Pernille Lund HansenHealth Sciences Research Centre, University College Lillebaelt, Odense, Denmark.
Peter Mygind LethInstitute of Forensic Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Pernille Aagaard NielsenHealth Sciences Research Centre, University College Lillebaelt, Odense, Denmark.
Dina Maria BechHealth Sciences Research Centre, University College Lillebaelt, Odense, Denmark.
Julie Brandhøj NielsenHealth Sciences Research Centre, University College Lillebaelt, Odense, Denmark.
Svea Deppe MørupHealth Sciences Research Centre, University College Lillebaelt, Odense, Denmark.
Anette Koch HolstDepartment of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Lene BakDepartment of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Mette R PoulsenDepartment of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Pernille W GreisenDepartment of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Dennis Lund HansenDepartment of Hematology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Helle PrechtHealth Sciences Research Centre, University College Lillebaelt, Odense, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Postmortem Computed Tomography (PMCT) is gradually introduced at forensic institutes. Image reconstruction software can increase diagnostic potential in CT by increasing distinction between structures and reduction of artifacts. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate novel image reconstruction parameters for postmortem conditions, to increase image quality and diagnostic potential of CT scans. Method: Twenty PMCT scans of deceased hereof two in severe decay were subjected to four reconstruction techniques: a standard reconstruction algorithm, the detail reconstruction algorithm and two novel algorithms based on the standard algorithm, but with different Hounsfield settings. Image quality was evaluated by visual grading analysis (VGA) by four forensic radiologist observers. Results: The VGA did not prove that any of the reconstruction techniques were superior to the others. For standard and detail, the two pre-defined reconstruction algorithms, VGA scores were indiscernible and were superior to the equally indiscernible Hounsfield reconstructions on parameters translated into Sharpness and Low Contrast Resolution. The two alternative Hounsfield settings were superior with respect to Noise and Artifacts/Beam Hardening. Conclusion: The study elucidates the possiblity for multiple reconstructions specialized for PMCT conditions, to accommodate the special conditions when working with the deceased. Despite the lack of clear improvements in the tested reconstructions, this study provides an insight into some of the possibilities of improving PMCT quality using reconstruction techniques.

Indexed as

Diagnostic qualityForensic pathologyImage qualityPostmortem computed tomographyVirtopsyVirtual autopsy

Identifiers

PMID38779309
PMCPMC11109732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.