ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2024
Comparative evaluation of the antibacterial activity of curcumin-coated gutta-percha versus nanocurcumin-coated gutta-percha against Escherichia coli: An
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Turmeric Polymer Fiber Mats (T-PFMs): Solution Blow Spun Turmeric/PLGA Composites as a Comprehensive Wound Care Platform.ACS applied polymer materials · 2026Article
- Curcumin-Based Nanoformulations for Oral Health: Mechanistic Insights, Antimicrobial Efficacy, and Future Clinical Perspectives.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Novel approaches involving curcumin in endodontic and periodontal diseases: a scoping review.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Aptamer-mediated liver-targeted curcumin delivery system based on tetrahedral framework nucleic acids for NAFLD.Drug delivery · 2025Article
- Comparative evaluation of bioactive calcium silicate coating on functionalized gutta-percha and its effect on bioceramic sealer wettability - AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Due to its biological and antibacterial qualities, many plants, including curcumin, are used as phytomedicines in dentistry. They are primarily used as intracanal medication in endodontics to prevent probable chemical side effects and also to address antimicrobial resistance. Curcumin nanoformulations have improved antibacterial activity and improved dispersion, making them the superior form of curcumin. The purpose of this study was to assess curcumin and nanocurcumin's antibacterial properties. As a gutta-percha coating, they are to be tested against Escherichia coli. Materials and Methods: The study employs the standard strain of E. coli, ATCC 25922. The antibacterial activity of gutta-percha cones against E. coli is assessed after coating them with suspensions of curcumin and nanocurcumin. Scanning electron microscopy is utilized to evaluate the coatings' continuity. Results: The gutta-percha cones that are untreated, coated with curcumin, and coated with nanocurcumin exhibit significantly different levels of antibacterial activity. There is statistically significant variation in their antibacterial activity. Conclusion: (1) Compared to curcumin-coated and untreated gutta-percha cones, those coated with nanocurcumin exhibit a stronger antibacterial activity. (2) Compared to uncoated gutta-percha cones, gutta-percha cones coated with curcumin exhibit more antibacterial action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.