Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38779133›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2024

Factors Associated With High-Risk and Low-Risk Bone Stress Injury in Female Runners: Implications for Risk Factor Stratification and Management.

Adam S Tenforde, Kathryn E Ackerman, Mary L Bouxsein, Logan Gaudette, Lauren McCall, Sara E Rudolph, Sarah Gehman, Margaret Garrahan, Julie M Hughes, Jereme Outerleys and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Adam S TenfordeDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding National Running Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Kathryn E AckermanWu Tsai Female Athlete Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Mary L BouxseinEndocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Logan GaudetteDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding National Running Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Lauren McCallWu Tsai Female Athlete Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sara E RudolphEndocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sarah GehmanEndocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Margaret GarrahanEndocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Julie M HughesMilitary Performance Division, United States Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, Massachusetts, USA.
Jereme OuterleysDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding National Running Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Irene S DavisSchool of Physical Therapy Tampa, University of South Florida, Florida, USA.
Kristin L PoppEndocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bone stress injury (BSI) is a common overuse injury in active women. BSIs can be classified as high-risk (pelvis, sacrum, and femoral neck) or low-risk (tibia, fibula, and metatarsals). Risk factors for BSI include low energy availability, menstrual dysfunction, and poor bone health. Higher vertical load rates during running have been observed in women with a history of BSI. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to characterize factors associated with BSI in a population of premenopausal women, comparing those with a history of high-risk or low-risk BSI with those with no history of BSI. It was hypothesized that women with a history of high-risk BSI would be more likely to exhibit lower bone mineral density (BMD) and related factors and less favorable bone microarchitecture compared with women with a history of low-risk BSI. In contrast, women with a history of low-risk BSI would have higher load rates. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Enrolled were 15 women with a history of high-risk BSI, 15 with a history of low-risk BSI, and 15 with no history of BSI. BMD for the whole body, hip, and spine was standardized using Results: Women with a history of high-risk BSI had lower spine Conclusion: Women with a history of high-risk BSI were more likely to exhibit risk factors for poor bone health, including lower BMD, while load rates did not distinguish women with a history of BSI.

Indexed as

biomechanicsbone densitydual-energy x-ray absorptiometrystress fracturestress reaction

Identifiers

PMID38779133
PMCPMC11110515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.