Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38779127›Full record

ArticleObstetrics and gynecology international2024

Prediction of Adverse Maternal Outcomes in Women with Early-Onset Preeclampsia with Severe Features in Mexico: Validation of the Full-PIERS Model.

Eduardo Ponce Nájera, Marcela Montoya Hinojosa, Rogelio Armando Lozano Galván, Diego González Oropeza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics and gynecology international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Validation of the fullPIERS model for predicting severe maternal outcomes in preeclampsia in five Brazilian centers.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eduardo Ponce NájeraDepartment of Obstetrics, Hospital Regional Materno Infantil del Estado de Nuevo León, Monterrey 67140, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1778-1942
Marcela Montoya HinojosaDepartment of Obstetrics, Hospital Regional Materno Infantil del Estado de Nuevo León, Monterrey 67140, Mexico.
Rogelio Armando Lozano GalvánHospital Zambrano Hellion TecSalud, Monterrey 66260, Mexico.
Diego González OropezaDepartment of Obstetrics, Hospital Regional Materno Infantil del Estado de Nuevo León, Monterrey 67140, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Validate the full-PIERS model in predicting adverse maternal outcomes in women with early-onset preeclampsia with severe features in our population. Methods: Retrospective cohort study. We applied the full-PIERS model on 130 women with severe early-onset preeclampsia who were treated at a second-level hospital in Nuevo León, México. We validated the full-PIERS model in its ability to discriminate through the AUROC. Results: The full-PIERS model applied to the data obtained in our study had good discrimination, revealing an AUC of 0.718 (95% CI 0.515-0.921; Conclusion: The full-PIERS model can predict adverse maternal outcomes in women admitted to our hospital with severe early-onset preeclampsia within 48 hours of admission.

Identifiers

PMID38779127
PMCPMC11111297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.