ArticleIEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics2023
Wearable Mechatronic Ultrasound-integrated AR Navigation System for Lumbar Puncture Guidance.
Article in IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative study of ultrasound shape completion and CBCT-based AR workflows for spinal needle interventions.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Application of Nanogenerators in Lumbar Motion Monitoring: Fundamentals, Current Status, and Perspectives.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- StraightTrack: Towards mixed reality navigation system for percutaneous K-wire insertion.Healthcare technology letters · 2024Article
- A Comparative Study of MR-Guided Needle Insertion for Surgical Procedures: Insights From HoloLens 2, Magic Leap 2 and Apple Vision Pro.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As one of the most commonly performed spinal interventions in routine clinical practice, lumbar punctures are usually done with only hand palpation and trial-and-error. Failures can prolong procedure time and introduce complications such as cerebrospinal fluid leaks and headaches. Therefore, an effective needle insertion guidance method is desired. In this work, we present a complete lumbar puncture guidance system with the integration of (1) a wearable mechatronic ultrasound imaging device, (2) volume-reconstruction and bone surface estimation algorithms and (3) two alternative augmented reality user interfaces for needle guidance, including a HoloLens-based and a tablet-based solution. We conducted a quantitative evaluation of the end-to-end navigation accuracy, which shows that our system can achieve an overall needle navigation accuracy of 2.83 mm and 2.76 mm for the Tablet-based and the HoloLens-based solutions, respectively. In addition, we conducted a preliminary user study to qualitatively evaluate the effectiveness and ergonomics of our system on lumbar phantoms. The results show that users were able to successfully reach the target in an average of 1.12 and 1.14 needle insertion attempts for Tablet-based and HoloLens-based systems, respectively, exhibiting the potential to reduce the failure rates of lumbar puncture procedures with the proposed lumbar-puncture guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.