Insufficiency of quality of life as the treatment endpoint for balloon pulmonary angioplasty in inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

Background and Objectives: The ability of a quality of life (QoL) to guide balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) among patients with inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) has not been fully investigated. This study explored the relationship between QoL scores and hemodynamics in CTEPH patients after BPA and examined whether QoL could be applied as a treatment endpoint. Materials and Methods: This cohort study included patients with inoperable CTEPH who had undergone at least four sessions of BPA. The patients' demographic and clinical data as well as hemodynamic parameters and scores from the RAND 36-item short-form QoL questionnaire were recorded and compared before and after BPA. Results: After BPA treatments, clinical characteristics, hemodynamic parameters, as well as QoL score improved significantly. A physical component summary (PCS) score of 35 or 46 can be used as the cutoff value for predicting better World Health Organization functional classification (WHO FC). Patients who had a higher PCS would have longer 6-min walk distance (6MWD), lower pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), and better cardiac output (CO) both before and after BPA. However, 19 patients (55.9%) with a higher PCS score after BPA did not achieve the goal of mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) ≤30 mmHg. During the follow-up period, a significant reduction of PVR was observed, but the PCS score improved a little. Conclusions: QoL is a useful tool for assessing the exercise endurance of patients with inoperable CTEPH treated with BPA, but is insufficient to serve as a treatment endpoint for BPA.