ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
A retrospective study of
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluating the diagnostic value ofJapanese journal of radiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of various pulmonary lesions as revealed by Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 99 patients with pulmonary lesions, who were categorized into three distinct groups: primary lung tumors (G1), metastatic lung tumors (G2), and benign lesions (G3). Each participant underwent a Results: The study's participants were composed of 52 males and 47 females, with an average age of 56.8 ± 13.2 years. A higher uptake and detection rate for pulmonary lesions were exhibited by Group G1 compared to the other groups (SUVmax [G1 vs. G2 vs. G3: 9.1 ± 4.1 vs. 6.1 ± 4.1 vs. 5.3 ± 5.8], Conclusion:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.