ReviewFrontiers in oncology2024
Microbes for lung cancer detection: feasibility and limitations.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gut microbiome-epigenetic crosstalk in obesity and type 2 diabetes: mechanisms, evidence, and translational opportunities.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- A global bibliometric map of Mendelian randomization in lung cancer research: trends, themes, and emerging risks.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Microbial hallmarks of the respiratory tract in lung cancer: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in microbiomes · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the second most common cancer in the world, the development of lung cancer is closely related to factors such as heredity, environmental exposure, and lung microenvironment, etc. Early screening and diagnosis of lung cancer can be helpful for the treatment of patients. Currently, CT screening and histopathologic biopsy are widely used in the clinical detection of lung cancer, but they have many disadvantages such as false positives and invasive operations. Microbes are another genome of the human body, which has recently been shown to be closely related to chronic inflammatory, metabolic processes in the host. At the same time, they are important players in cancer development, progression, treatment, and prognosis. The use of microbes for cancer therapy has been extensively studied, however, the diagnostic role of microbes is still unclear. This review aims to summarize recent research on using microbes for lung cancer detection and present the current shortcomings of microbes in collection and detection. Finally, it also looks ahead to the clinical benefits that may accrue to patients in the future about screening and early detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.