ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Ampholytic ion-exchange magnetic beads: a promising tool for selecting short fragments in circulating cell-free DNA analysis.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Zwitterionic Poly(sulfobetaine methacrylate) Brushes Functionalized Threads for DNA Extraction from Complex Cell Lysates.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: For liquid biopsy of cancer, the extraction of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from plasma is required. We evaluated the efficacy of use of magnetic submicron particles coated with abundant small zwitterions (MSP-ZEWBs) for extracting short fragments of cfDNA. Methods: We developed and optimized an MSP-ZEWB-based cfDNA extraction method using ampholytic ion-exchange materials and compared its results with those using a control kit. We measured the cfDNA concentration by quantitative polymerase-chain-reaction and using the Qubit method and analyzed cfDNA fragmentation patterns using a bioanalyzer. Results: The fragment size of cfDNA isolated from glycine hydrochloric acid at a pH of 2.2 exhibited a better alignment with the DNA marker. The highest DNA intensity was observed at the final concentration of 0.8% polyethylene glycol 8000. The intensity of cfDNA decreased significantly when isolated from plasma with DNA marker using MSP-ZEWBs with an adsorption buffer containing guanidine hydrochloride or isothiocyanoguanidine. All fragments were successfully extracted using MSP-ZEWBs from both plasma and phosphate-buffered saline. Notably, the intensity of short cfDNA fragments isolated using MSP-ZEWBs remained consistent for recovery of long DNA fragments. indicating a potential selective of small fragments. Conclusion: The extraction of plasma cfDNA with MSP-ZEWBs requires no protein denaturation, shows resistance to cells remaining in plasma, and demonstrates higher overall efficiency and better reproducibility than other extraction methods. Use of MSP-ZEWBs may greatly enhance liquid biopsy of cancers through the analysis of plasma cfDNA in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.