Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38779058›Full record

ArticleWellcome open research2023

Using machine learning to extract information and predict outcomes from reports of randomised trials of smoking cessation interventions in the Human Behaviour-Change Project.

Robert West, Francesca Bonin, James Thomas, Alison J Wright, Pol Mac Aonghusa, Martin Gleize, Yufang Hou, Alison O'Mara-Eves, Janna Hastings, Marie Johnston and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wellcome open research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Robert WestResearch Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6398-0921
Francesca BoninIBM Research Europe, Dublin, Ireland.
James ThomasEPPI-Centre, Social Research Institute, University College London, London, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4805-4190
Alison J WrightInstitute of Pharmaceutical Science, King's College London, London, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0373-5219
Pol Mac AonghusaIBM Research Europe, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7640-9668
Martin GleizeIBM Research Europe, Dublin, Ireland.
Yufang HouIBM Research Europe, Dublin, Ireland.
Alison O'Mara-EvesEPPI-Centre, Social Research Institute, University College London, London, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0359-6423
Janna HastingsInstitute for Implementation Science in Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3469-4923
Marie JohnstonAberdeen Health Psychology Group, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0124-4827
Susan MichieCentre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0063-6378

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L011115/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Using reports of randomised trials of smoking cessation interventions as a test case, this study aimed to develop and evaluate machine learning (ML) algorithms for extracting information from study reports and predicting outcomes as part of the Human Behaviour-Change Project. It is the first of two linked papers, with the second paper reporting on further development of a prediction system. Methods: Researchers manually annotated 70 items of information ('entities') in 512 reports of randomised trials of smoking cessation interventions covering intervention content and delivery, population, setting, outcome and study methodology using the Behaviour Change Intervention Ontology. These entities were used to train ML algorithms to extract the information automatically. The information extraction ML algorithm involved a named-entity recognition system using the 'FLAIR' framework. The manually annotated intervention, population, setting and study entities were used to develop a deep-learning algorithm using multiple layers of long-short-term-memory (LSTM) components to predict smoking cessation outcomes. Results: The F1 evaluation score, derived from the false positive and false negative rates (range 0-1), for the information extraction algorithm averaged 0.42 across different types of entity (SD=0.22, range 0.05-0.88) compared with an average human annotator's score of 0.75 (SD=0.15, range 0.38-1.00). The algorithm for assigning entities to study arms ( Conclusions: While some success was achieved in using ML to extract information from reports of randomised trials of smoking cessation interventions, we identified major challenges that could be addressed by greater standardisation in the way that studies are reported. Outcome prediction from smoking cessation studies may benefit from development of novel algorithms,

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebehaviour change interventionsevidence synthesisinformation extractionsmachine learningnatural language processingontologiesprediction systems

Identifiers

PMID38779058
PMCPMC11109593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.