Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38779004›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Emerging markets' response to COVID-19: Insights from arbitrages strategies.

Wang Jialu, Lingdi Zhao, Hao Li, Xiuqi Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wang JialuSchool of Economics, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China.
Lingdi ZhaoSchool of Economics, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China.
Hao LiDaniels School of Business, Purdue University, West Lafayette 47906, USA.
Xiuqi GuoSchool of Finance, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300350, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global capital markets are sensitive to extreme and physical events. This research explores the influence of COVID-19 on cross-border arbitrage strategies in emerging markets. Specifically, this study develops a novel cross-market pairs trading strategy centered on healthcare stocks, tailored for the unique dynamics of the emerging market environment. The feasibility of cross-border arbitrage strategies in emerging markets is demonstrated by comparing the performance of the strategy before and after the outbreak. Additionally, sensitivity analysis of the risk preference factors before and after the COVID-19 outbreak further supports this argument. These findings offer valuable insights for international investors seeking arbitrage between emerging and other markets and, effectively responding to global shocks.

Indexed as

Capital marketsCOVID-19Cross-border investmentsEmerging marketsFinancial integrationMarket shocksPairs trading strategy

Identifiers

PMID38779004
PMCPMC11109850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.