Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38778965›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

Sand screens application and performance for sand control: A review of selection criteria, screen materials, and causes of failure.

Abdullah Abduljabbar, Azubuike Amadi, Mysara Eissa Mohyaldinn, Syahrir Ridha, Obai Younis, Fahd Saeed Alakbari

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Abdullah AbduljabbarCenter of Flow Assurance, Institute of Subsurface Resources, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Malaysia.
Azubuike AmadiPetroleum Engineering Department, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Malaysia.
Mysara Eissa MohyaldinnCenter of Flow Assurance, Institute of Subsurface Resources, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Malaysia.
Syahrir RidhaInstitute of Subsurface Resources, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Malaysia.
Obai YounisDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering in Wadi Addwasir, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.
Fahd Saeed AlakbariCenter of Flow Assurance, Institute of Subsurface Resources, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Production of sand from oil and gas wells necessitates the application of techniques for sand control. Sand screens are widely used. However, they are susceptible to failures, often stemming from improper selection and design. This study reviews existing selection criteria and identifies the causes of failures. It has been concluded that, sand screens selection should not rely on a single method but should consider a comprehensive combination of factors. This paper presents comparative analyses among various sand screen types. Also, it compares different materials used in sand screens, such as expandable, ceramics, metallic alloys, polymers, and shape memory materials, in terms of their performance and susceptibility to failure. These comprehensive comparisons can greatly assist in the optimized selection process for sand screens.

Indexed as

Sand screen performanceSand screen selectionScreen erosionShape memory

Identifiers

PMID38778965
PMCPMC11109723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.