ArticleHeliyon2024
In Vitro Glucose Measurement from NIR and MIR Spectroscopy: Comprehensive Benchmark of Machine Learning and Filtering Chemometrics.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Blood Glucose Level Prediction in Type 1 Diabetes: Methods, Evaluation, and Emerging Advances.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Personalised Blood Glucose Time Series Forecasting in Type 1 Diabetes: Deep Collaborative Adversarial Learning.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Real-time monitoring of selective laser sintering 3D printing process for lamivudine content quantification in the printlets: a modern solution to a modern problem.International journal of pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Analysis of glucose concentrations in blood solutions using FTIR and Raman spectroscopy methods.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Data-driven blood glucose level prediction in type 1 diabetes: a comprehensive comparative analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The quantitative analysis of glucose using spectroscopy is a topic of great significance and interest in science and industry. One conundrum in this area is deploying appropriate preprocessing and regression tools. To contribute to addressing this challenge, in this study, we conducted a comprehensive and novel comparative analysis of various machine learning and preprocessing filtering techniques applied to near-infrared, mid-infrared, and a combination of near-infrared and mid-infrared spectroscopy for glucose assay. Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of these techniques in accurately predicting glucose levels and to determine which approach was most optimal. Our investigation involved the acquisition of spectral data from samples of glucose solutions using the three aforementioned spectroscopy techniques. The data was subjected to several preprocessing filtering methods, including convolutional moving average, Savitzky-Golay, multiplicative scatter correction, and normalisation. We then applied representative machine learning algorithms from three categories: linear modelling, traditional nonlinear modelling, and artificial neural networks. The evaluation results revealed that linear models exhibited higher predictive accuracy than nonlinear models, whereas artificial neural network models demonstrated comparable performance. Additionally, the comparative analysis of various filtering methods demonstrated that the convolutional moving average and Savitzky-Golay filters yielded the most precise outcomes overall. In conclusion, our study provides valuable insights into the efficacy of different machine learning techniques for glucose measurement and highlights the importance of applying appropriate filtering methods in enhancing predictive accuracy. These findings have important implications for the development of new and improved glucose quantification technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.