ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2024
Analysis of Risk Factors for Post-Extraction Bleeding and Study on Emergency Intervention Strategies.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of mucosal fenestration drainage on postoperative complications following surgical extraction of mandibular third molars: a randomized controlled clinical trial.BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- Oral anticoagulant periprocedural management in patients undergoing an oral, dental implant or periodontal surgery: a prospective national observational survey.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this investigation is to delineate the distributional attributes of factors correlated with post-tooth extraction bleeding and to scrutinize corresponding strategies for emergency prevention and intervention. Methods: The chi-squared test and rank sum test were deployed to evaluate fluctuations in blood loss. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression methodologies were employed to compute the odds ratio (OR) and its associated 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Furthermore, we delved into the relationship between each contributing factor and blood loss. Concurrently, univariate and multivariate logistic regression techniques were utilized to probe the nexus between blood loss and treatment modalities. Results: Following adjustments for pertinent factors, the outcomes of multivariate analyses unveiled an escalated susceptibility to bleeding among male patients and individuals aged 60 years or older. The adjusted OR values and their corresponding 95% CI were determined as follows: OR = 1.54 (95% CI: 1.34-1.77, P < 0.001), OR = 0.74 (95% CI: 0.59-0.91, P = 0.005), OR = 0.58 (95% CI: 0.42-0.80, P = 0.001). Additionally, the results of multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that, in contrast to individuals experiencing minimal blood loss, the OR values associated with treatment modalities for patients encountering substantial blood loss, namely iodoform gauze strips, sutures, collagen, and compression, were noted as follows: OR = 220.80 (95% CI: 151.43-321.95, P < 0.001), OR = 69.40 (95% CI: 46.11-104.44, P < 0.001), OR = 52.78 (95% CI: 34.66-80.38, P < 0.001), OR = 12.85 (95% CI: 9.46-17.45, P < 0.001). Conclusion: It is imperative to prioritize the scrutiny of risk factors associated with post-tooth extraction hemorrhage, with the aim of preemptively averting incidences of bleeding subsequent to tooth extraction. Moreover, it is paramount to offer expert and tailored emergency interventions designed to address diverse case scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.