ArticleResuscitation plus2024
Agonal breathing upon hospital arrival as a prognostic factor in patients experiencing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07695766 (Evaluation of CPR Training and Agonal Breathing Recognition Among New Taipei City Police Officers in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Events), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of CPR Training and Agonal Breathing Recognition Among New Taipei City Police Officers in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Events
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between agonal breathing and outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective study.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026Article
- Characterizing the physiology of circulatory arrest in humans.Nature medicine · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Agonal breathing is a relatively common symptom that follows cardiac arrest when the brainstem function is preserved. Agonal breathing is associated with favorable survival in patients experiencing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). While previous studies focused on agonal breathing observed in the pre-hospital setting for all study subjects, we focused on agonal breathing observed upon hospital arrival. In this multicenter prospective study, we aimed to assess the prognosis of patients exhibiting agonal breathing upon hospital arrival were compared. We hypothesized that agonal breathing at hospital arrival would be associated with favorable neurological outcomes among patients with OHCA. Methods: The data on incidence of agonal breathing were prospectively collected for all evaluable participants in a multicenter, observational study in Japan (SOS-KANTO [Survey of Survivors after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Kanto Area] 2017 Study). Groups with and without agonal breathing were compared upon hospital arrival. Propensity-score with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was performed to adjust for confounding factors. The primary outcome was a favorable neurological outcome (Cerebral Performance Category 1-2) at 1 month. Results: A total of 6,457 participants out of the 9,909 registered in SOS-KANTO 2017 (in which 42 facilities participated) were selected for the current study. There were 128 patients (2.0%) in the with-agonal breathing group and 6,329 (98.0%) in the withoutagonal breathing group. The primary outcome was 1.1% in the with-agonal breathing group and 0.6% in the without-agonal breathing group (risk difference, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.87) after IPTW analysis. Conclusion: In this multicenter prospective study, agonal breathing at hospital arrival was significantly associated with better neurological outcomes and increased survival at 1 month. Thus, agonal breathing at hospital arrival may be a useful prognostic predictor for patients experiencing OHCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.