ArticleClinical and experimental emergency medicine2025
Physician awareness of fluid volume administered with intravenous antibiotics: a structured interview-based study.
Article in Clinical and experimental emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Systems-based Emergency Department Intervention to Conserve Intravenous Fluids During a National Shortage.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveFluids administered as drug diluents with intravenous (IV) medicine constitute a substantial fraction of fluids in inpatients. Whether physicians are aware of fluid volumes administered with IV antibiotics for patients with suspected infections is unclear. Moreover, whether this leads to adjustments in 24-hour fluid administration/antibiotics is unknown.
methodsThis cross-sectional interview-based study was conducted in three emergency departments. Physicians were interviewed after prescribing around-the-clock IV antibiotics for ≥24 hours to patients with suspected infection. A structured interview guide assessed the physicians' awareness, considerations, and practices when prescribing IV antibiotics. The 24-hour antibiotic fluid volume was calculated.
resultsWe interviewed 100 physicians. The 24-hour fluid volume administered with IV antibiotics was 400 mL (interquartile range, 300-400 mL). Overall, 53 physicians (53%) were unaware of the fluid volume administered with IV antibiotics. Moreover, 76 (76%) did not account for the antibiotic fluid volume in the 24-hour fluid administration, and 96 (96%) indicated that they would not adjust prescribed fluids after receiving information about 24-hour antibiotic fluid volume administered for their patient. No comorbidities associated with fluid intolerance were the primary reason for not adjusting prescribed fluids/ antibiotics. Approximately 79 (79%) opted for visibility of fluid volumes administered with IV antibiotics in the medical record.
conclusionThe majority of physicians were unaware of fluid volumes administered as a drug diluent with IV antibiotics. The majority chose not to make post-prescribing adjustments to their planned fluid administration; they regarded their patient as fluid tolerant. The physicians opted for visibility of fluid volumes administered as diluents during the prescribing process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.