ArticleRetrovirology2024
HIV-1 with gag processing defects activates cGAS sensing.
Article in Retrovirology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineered fluorescence for live diagnostics and quantification of poxvirus infection.The Journal of general virology · 2026Article
- HIV-1 derived oligonucleotides induce a type I IFN/STING dependent immune suppression reversible by targeting IFNARI.PLoS pathogens · 2026Article
- HIV-1 and Its Strategy for Hiding Viral cDNA from STING-Mediated Innate Immunity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Neurotropic Viruses as Acute and Insidious Drivers of Aging.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- HIV capsids: orchestrators of innate immune evasion, pathogenesis and pandemicity.The Journal of general virology · 2025Review
- Impact of Genomic Mutation on Melanoma Immune Microenvironment and IFN-1 Pathway-Driven Therapeutic Responses.Cancers · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDetection of viruses by host pattern recognition receptors induces the expression of type I interferon (IFN) and IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs), which suppress viral replication. Numerous studies have described HIV-1 as a poor activator of innate immunity in vitro. The exact role that the viral capsid plays in this immune evasion is not fully understood.
resultsTo better understand the role of the HIV-1 capsid in sensing we tested the effect of making HIV-1 by co-expressing a truncated Gag that encodes the first 107 amino acids of capsid fused with luciferase or GFP, alongside wild type Gag-pol. We found that unlike wild type HIV-1, viral particles produced with a mixture of wild type and truncated Gag fused to luciferase or GFP induced a potent IFN response in THP-1 cells and macrophages. Innate immune activation by Gag-fusion HIV-1 was dependent on reverse transcription and DNA sensor cGAS, suggesting activation of an IFN response by viral DNA. Further investigation revealed incorporation of the Gag-luciferase/GFP fusion proteins into viral particles that correlated with subtle defects in wild type Gag cleavage and a diminished capacity to saturate restriction factor TRIM5α, likely due to aberrant particle formation. We propose that expression of the Gag fusion protein disturbs the correct cleavage and maturation of wild type Gag, yielding viral particles that are unable to effectively shield viral DNA from detection by innate sensors including cGAS.
conclusionsThese data highlight the crucial role of capsid in innate evasion and support growing literature that disruption of Gag cleavage and capsid formation induces a viral DNA- and cGAS-dependent innate immune response. Together these data demonstrate a protective role for capsid and suggest that antiviral activity of capsid-targeting antivirals may benefit from enhanced innate and adaptive immunity in vivo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.