Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38778390›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2024

Do no harm: the impact of implementing cancer prevention strategies on other preventive health measures.

Karen M Emmons, Leslie Pelton-Cairns, Daniel A Gundersen, Jennifer L Cruz, Lynette Mascioli, Gina R Kruse, ISCCCE Partnership

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Karen M EmmonsDepartment of Social and Behavioral Science, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 2115, USA. kemmons@hsph.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0685-6446
Leslie Pelton-CairnsThe Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers, 40 Court Street, 10th Floor, Boston, MA, 02108, USA.
Daniel A GundersenDepartment of Social and Behavioral Science, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 2115, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2543-9231
Jennifer L CruzDepartment of Social and Behavioral Science, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 2115, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4035-743X
Lynette MascioliThe Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers, 40 Court Street, 10th Floor, Boston, MA, 02108, USA.
Gina R KruseDivision of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 100 Cambridge Street, 16th floor, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6681-220X
ISCCCE Partnership

Funding

The Implementation Science Center for Cancer Control Equity - Research ProgramP50CA244433 · NCI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI EMMONS, KAREN M., TAVERAS BENAVIDEZ, ELSIE MIREYA · 2019 to 2023
$12.5M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA244433NCI NIH HHS P50CA244433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranslational efforts to increase uptake of evidence-based practices typically look at those outcomes in isolation of their impact on other aspects of care delivery. If we are in fact to "do no harm", we must consider the possible negative impact of improving use of one practice on other quality measures. Alternatively, a focus on one practice could lead to spread of effective strategies to other practices, which would be highly beneficial. We studied the impact of a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening initiative on delivery of other preventive care measures.

methodsWe used an interrupted time series design with implementation year as the interruption point. The initiative was conducted between 2015 and 2020, with three staggered cohorts. Main outcomes were quality measures for colorectal cancer screening, cervical cancer screening, hypertension management, diabetes management, weight screening and follow-up, tobacco use screening and cessation treatment, and depression screening and follow-up.

resultsThe initiative was associated with an increase in CRC screening (OR = 1.67, p ≤ 0.01; average marginal effect = 12.2% points), and did not reduce performance on other quality measures in the year of CRC program implementation or a change in their respective secular trends.

conclusionsThe initiative led to a clinically meaningful increase in CRC screening and was not associated with reductions in delivery of six other preventive services. Quality improvement (QI) initiatives typically approach implementation with an eye towards reducing unintended impact and leveraging existing staff and resources. Implementation research studies may benefit from considering how QI initiatives factor in the local context in implementation efforts.

Indexed as

Cancer screeningImplementationUnintended consequences

Identifiers

PMID38778390
PMCPMC11112943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.