Trial reportBMC medical education2024
Enhancing clinical skills in pediatric trainees: a comparative study of ChatGPT-assisted and traditional teaching methods.
Trial report in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The impact of generative artificial intelligence on clinical skills and knowledge acquisition in medical undergraduates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical education · 2026Pooled it
- The impact of integrating generative artificial intelligence into medical education on short-term learning outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC medical education · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence for affective-domain development in healthcare professions education: a systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of artificial intelligence assisted training and traditional learning paths in clinical simulation skills training: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- The impact of generative AI on health professional education: A systematic review in the context of student learning.Medical education · 2025Pooled it
- Effectiveness of generative artificial intelligence-based teaching versus traditional teaching methods in medical education: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC medical education · 2025Pooled it
- Leveraging ChatGPT to strengthen pediatric healthcare systems: a systematic review.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Pooled it
- The role of three-dimensional knowledge target teaching combined with immersive clinical experience in otology teaching practice.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Generative AI in medicine: use and acceptance among professionals in orthopedics and traumatology: a survey-based analysis in Germany.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Addressing Clinician-Educator Hesitancy Toward Artificial Intelligence Through a Peer-Led Instructional Design.Cureus · 2026Article
- Use of Digital Technology for Developing Communication Skills in Undergraduate and Postgraduate Medical Education: Scoping Review.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Enhancing Medical Education: The Role of Artificial Intelligence Tools in the Teaching-Learning Process.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Review
- AI-assisted learning in exercise physiology: a quasi-experimental study using PhysioExercise GPT.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- ChatGPT-4o with faculty guidance outperforms AI-only and traditional learning in ultrasonography training: a randomized trial.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Evaluating the Teaching Effectiveness of Interactive Virtual Platform Based on Artificial Intelligence for Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Training.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
- Token-splitting improves GPT-4.1 performance on plastic surgery exams: implications for AI-Assisted medical education.Medical education online · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of a 5G Local Area Network-Based Digital Microscopy Interactive System: Quasi-Experimental Design.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- Applications, Challenges, and Prospects of Generative Artificial Intelligence Empowering Medical Education: Scoping Review.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly integrates into medical education, its specific impact on the development of clinical skills among pediatric trainees needs detailed investigation. Pediatric training presents unique challenges which AI tools like ChatGPT may be well-suited to address.
objectiveThis study evaluates the effectiveness of ChatGPT-assisted instruction versus traditional teaching methods on pediatric trainees' clinical skills performance.
methodsA cohort of pediatric trainees (n = 77) was randomly assigned to two groups; one underwent ChatGPT-assisted training, while the other received conventional instruction over a period of two weeks. Performance was assessed using theoretical knowledge exams and Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercises (Mini-CEX), with particular attention to professional conduct, clinical judgment, patient communication, and overall clinical skills. Trainees' acceptance and satisfaction with the AI-assisted method were evaluated through a structured survey.
resultsBoth groups performed similarly in theoretical exams, indicating no significant difference (p > 0.05). However, the ChatGPT-assisted group showed a statistically significant improvement in Mini-CEX scores (p < 0.05), particularly in patient communication and clinical judgment. The AI-teaching approach received positive feedback from the majority of trainees, highlighting the perceived benefits in interactive learning and skill acquisition.
conclusionChatGPT-assisted instruction did not affect theoretical knowledge acquisition but did enhance practical clinical skills among pediatric trainees. The positive reception of the AI-based method suggests that it has the potential to complement and augment traditional training approaches in pediatric education. These promising results warrant further exploration into the broader applications of AI in medical education scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.