Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38778256›Full record

Observational studyBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024

Factors conditioning pain control and reduction in post-cesarean section parturients: a cross-sectional study.

Anna Bogusława Pilewska-Kozak, Magdalena Dziurka, Agnieszka Bałanda-Bałdyga, Marta Joanna Monist, Ewelina Kopiel, Krzysztof Jurek, Anna Francesca Łęcka, Beata Dobrowolska

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anna Bogusława Pilewska-KozakDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Nursing, Chair of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University in Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Magdalena DziurkaDepartment of Holistic Care and Nursing Management, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland. magdalena.dziurka@umlub.pl.
Agnieszka Bałanda-BałdygaIntegrated Medical Care Department, Medical Faculty, Collegium Medicum, Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Marta Joanna Monist2nd Chair and Clinic of Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University in Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Ewelina KopielThe Neonatal Unit of the University Clinical Hospital, No. 1 in Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Krzysztof JurekSociology of Culture, Religion and Social Participation Institute of Sociological Sciences, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Anna Francesca ŁęckaSaint Lazarus Hospice, The Society of Friends to People in Disease, Cracow, Poland.
Beata DobrowolskaDepartment of Holistic Care and Nursing Management, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPain experienced by women in the perinatal period constitutes a complex and multifaceted phenomenon. The aim of the study was to assess conditions of pain locus of control and pain reduction in post-cesarean section parturients. MATERIALS AND

methodsA cross-sectional quantitative study with convenience sampling was performed among 175 hospitalized post-cesarean section women in hospitals in Eastern Poland in accordance with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement. A self-design questionnaire regarding general information and obstetrics/gynaecology medical interview, The Pain Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ) and The Beliefs about Pain Control Questionnaire (BPCQ) were used. The inclusion criteria were as follows (1) age of ⩾18 years old; (2) cesarean section (CS); (3) period from the 13th hour to the end of the 72nd hour after the procedure; and (4) informed consent. The data was analyzed with IBM SPSS Statistics.

resultsInternal locus of control (M = 14.02) was provided the highest value by the parturients and followed by chance events (M = 12.61) and doctors' power (M = 12.18). Dominant coping with pain strategies in the post-cesarean parturients were coping self-statements (M = 19.06), praying or hoping (M = 18.86). The parturients assessed their pain coping (M = 3.31) strategies along with pain reduction (M = 3.35) at the moderate level. Higher pain control was correlated with cognitive pain coping strategies (β = 0.305; t = 4.632; p < 0.001), internal pain control β = 0.191; t = 2.894; p = 0.004), cesarean section planning (β = -0.240; t = -3.496; p = 0.001) and past medical history of CS (β = 0.240; t = 3.481; p = 0.001). The skill of reduction of pain was positively associated with cognitive pain coping strategies (β = 0.266; t = 3.665; p < 0.001) and being in subsequent pregnancy (β = 0.147; t = 2.022; p = 0.045). Catastrophizing and hoping were related to lower competences of coping with pain (B = - 0.033, SE = 0.012, β = - 0.206, T = -2.861).

conclusionsThe study allowed for identification and better comprehension of factors conditioning pain control and pain reduction in parturients after the cesarean section. Furthermore, a stronger belief that pain can be dealt with is found in the parturients characterized by cognitive pain coping strategies and internal pain locus of control. The skill of reduction of pain is related to cognitive coping strategy and procreation status.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalCesarean SectionInternal-External ControlPostoperative PainAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPain ManagementPolandPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultBeliefsCesarean sectionPain controlPain coping strategies

Identifiers

PMID38778256
PMCPMC11112804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.