Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38778185›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Optical sensor reveals the hidden influence of cell dissociation on adhesion measurements.

Kinga Dóra Kovács, Zoltán Szittner, Beatrix Magyaródi, Beatrix Péter, Bálint Szabó, Alexa Vörös, Nicolett Kanyó, Inna Székács, Robert Horvath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kinga Dóra KovácsNanobiosensorics Laboratory, MFA, Centre for Energy Research, HUN-REN, Budapest, Hungary.
Zoltán SzittnerNanobiosensorics Laboratory, MFA, Centre for Energy Research, HUN-REN, Budapest, Hungary.
Beatrix MagyaródiNanobiosensorics Laboratory, MFA, Centre for Energy Research, HUN-REN, Budapest, Hungary.
Beatrix PéterNanobiosensorics Laboratory, MFA, Centre for Energy Research, HUN-REN, Budapest, Hungary.
Bálint SzabóDepartment of Biological Physics, ELTE Eötvös University, Budapest, Hungary.
Alexa VörösNanobiosensorics Laboratory, MFA, Centre for Energy Research, HUN-REN, Budapest, Hungary.
Nicolett KanyóNanobiosensorics Laboratory, MFA, Centre for Energy Research, HUN-REN, Budapest, Hungary.
Inna SzékácsNanobiosensorics Laboratory, MFA, Centre for Energy Research, HUN-REN, Budapest, Hungary.
Robert HorvathNanobiosensorics Laboratory, MFA, Centre for Energy Research, HUN-REN, Budapest, Hungary. horvath.robert@ek.hun-ren.hu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell adhesion experiments are important in tissue engineering and for testing new biologically active surfaces, prostheses, and medical devices. Additionally, the initial state of adhesion (referred to as nascent adhesion) plays a key role and is currently being intensively researched. A critical step in handling all adherent cell types is their dissociation from their substrates for further processing. Various cell dissociation methods and reagents are used in most tissue culture laboratories (here, cell dissociation from the culture surface, cell harvesting, and cell detachment are used interchangeably). Typically, the dissociated cells are re-adhered for specific measurements or applications. However, the impact of the choice of dissociation method on cell adhesion in subsequent measurements, especially when comparing the adhesivity of various surfaces, is not well clarified. In this study, we demonstrate that the application of a label-free optical sensor can precisely quantify the effect of cell dissociation methods on cell adhesivity, both at the single-cell and population levels. The optical measurements allow for high-resolution monitoring of cellular adhesion without interfering with the physiological state of the cells. We found that the choice of reagent significantly alters cell adhesion on various surfaces. Our results clearly demonstrate that biological conclusions about cellular adhesion when comparing various surfaces are highly dependent on the employed dissociation method. Neglecting the choice of cellular dissociation can lead to misleading conclusions when evaluating cell adhesion data from various sources and comparing the adhesivity of two different surfaces (i.e., determining which surface is more or less adhesive).

Indexed as

Cell AdhesionHumansSurface Properties

Identifiers

PMID38778185
PMCPMC11111754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.