Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38778171›Full record

Trial reportHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2024

Hypotensive effects of exercise training: are postmenopausal women with hypertension non-responders or responders?

Marina Lívia Venturini Ferreira, Alex Castro, Silas Gabriel de Oliveira Nunes, Marcus Vinícius Mattos Abreu Dos Santos, Cláudia Regina Cavaglieri, Hirofumi Tanaka, Mara Patrícia Traina Chacon-Mikahil

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marina Lívia Venturini FerreiraLaboratory of Exercise Physiology, School of Physical Education, University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. marina.lvferreira@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9869-6848
Alex CastroLaboratory of Exercise Physiology, School of Physical Education, University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Silas Gabriel de Oliveira NunesLaboratory of Exercise Physiology, School of Physical Education, University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcus Vinícius Mattos Abreu Dos SantosLaboratory of Exercise Physiology, School of Physical Education, University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Cláudia Regina CavaglieriLaboratory of Exercise Physiology, School of Physical Education, University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Hirofumi TanakaCardiovascular Aging Research Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Mara Patrícia Traina Chacon-MikahilLaboratory of Exercise Physiology, School of Physical Education, University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that increasing the exercise dose or changing the exercise mode would augment hypotensive effects when traditional aerobic exercise training failed to produce it in postmenopausal women. Sixty-five postmenopausal women with essential hypertension were randomly allocated into the continuous aerobic training (CAT) and non-exercising control (CON) groups. CAT group cycled at moderate intensity 3 times a week for 12 weeks. Individuals who failed to decrease systolic blood pressure (BP) were classified as non-responders (n = 34) and performed an additional 12 weeks of exercise training with either increasing the exercise dose or changing the exercise mode. The 3 follow-up groups were continuous aerobic training 3 times a week, continuous aerobic training 4 times a week, and high-intensity interval training. After the first 12 weeks of exercise training, systolic BP decreased by 1.5 mmHg (NS) with a wide range of inter-individual responses (-23 to 23 mmHg). Sixty-seven percent of women who were initially classified as non-responders participated in the second training period. Sixty percent of women who participated in continuous exercise training 3 or 4 times a week at greater exercise intensities reduced systolic BP. All (100%) of the women who performed high-intensity interval training experienced significant reductions in systolic BP. Traditional aerobic exercise was not sufficient to decrease BP significantly in the majority of postmenopausal women. However, those women who were not sensitive to recommended exercise may reduce BP if they were exposed to continuous aerobic exercise at higher intensities and/or volumes or a different mode of exercise.

Indexed as

Blood PressureExerciseHypertensionPostmenopauseAgedExercise TherapyFemaleHumansMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeEndurance trainingHigh-intensity interval trainingHypertensionRandomized exercise interventionResponsiveness

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.