ArticleInternational journal of impotence research2026
Trends and outcomes of hospitalized patients with priapism in Germany: results from the GRAND study.
Article in International journal of impotence research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on: Trends and outcomes of hospitalized patients with priapism in Germany: results from the GRAND study.International journal of impotence research · 2026Article
- Response to Comment on Trends and outcomes of hospitalized patients with priapism in Germany: results from the GRAND study.International journal of impotence research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to provide evidence on the trends and in-hospital outcomes of patients with low- and high-flow priapism through the largest study in the field. We used the GeRmAn Nationwide inpatient Data (GRAND), provided by the Research Data Center of the Federal Bureau of Statistics (2008-2021), and performed multiple patient-level analyses. We included 6,588 men with low-flow and 729 with high-flow priapism. Among patients with low-flow priapism, 156 (2.4%) suffered from sickle cell disease, and 1,477 (22.4%) patients required shunt surgery. Of them, only 37 (2.5%) received a concomitant penile prosthesis implantation (30 inflatable and 7 semi-rigid prosthesis). In Germany, the total number of patients with low-flow priapism requiring hospital stay has steadily increased, while the number of patients with high-flow priapism requiring hospital stay has decreased in the last years. Among patients with high-flow priapism, 136 (18.7%) required selective artery embolization. In men with low-flow priapism, sickle cell disease was associated with high rates of exchange transfusion (OR: 21, 95% CI: 14-31, p < 0.001). The length of hospital stay (p = 0.06) and the intensive care unit admissions (p = 0.9) did not differ between patients with low-flow priapism due to sickle cell disease versus other causes of low-flow priapism. Accordingly, in men with high-flow priapism, embolization was not associated with worse outcomes in terms of length of hospital stay (p > 0.9), transfusion (p = 0.8), and intensive care unit admission (p = 0.5). Low-flow priapism is an absolute emergency that requires shunt surgery in more than one-fifth of all patients requiring hospital stay. On the contrary, high-flow priapism is still managed, in most cases, conservatively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.